Search for: "Marks v. State"
Results 2261 - 2280
of 19,799
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Apr 2014, 5:30 am
Bus. v. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 4:05 am
"] USA Marble, LLC v. [read post]
9 Sep 2019, 12:21 pm
September marks the beginning of the academic year and an official end to the summer break. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 6:46 pm
What most people will take away from Harris v. [read post]
21 Jan 2012, 12:54 pm
In Holding Company of the Villages, Inc. v. [read post]
28 May 2009, 5:42 pm
State v. [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 3:03 am
ITEX Corp. v. [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 12:32 pm
3.State v. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 8:28 am
Christian Louboutin S.A. v. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 2:29 pm
The TTAB affirmed the USPTO denial of the mark stating that 15 U.S.C. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 11:57 am
See State v. [read post]
19 Aug 2024, 3:57 am
State Permits, Inc. v. [read post]
31 May 2011, 9:00 am
The Treaty marks a significant step in bilateral cooperation between the United States and Paraguay. [read post]
22 Aug 2020, 8:21 am
Longarzo * DMCA’s Unhelpful 512(f) Preempts Helpful State Law Claims–Stevens v. [read post]
13 Sep 2021, 2:04 pm
In State v. [read post]
6 Jun 2014, 12:55 am
Following the Advocate General’s opinion [on which see Jeremy’s post here], yesterday the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) rendered its decision in Case C-360/12 Coty Germany GmbH v First Note Perfumes NV. [read post]
4 Mar 2008, 12:37 am
The State (Trinidad And Tobago) [2008] UKPC 16 (3 March 2008) Knight v. [read post]
12 May 2010, 1:03 pm
Arizona State Trailer Sales, Inc. d/b/a Little Dealer Little Prices RV v. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 8:26 am
The same bottle was subsequently registered as a trade mark in Japan and a number of other countries, including Member States of the European Union. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 7:40 pm
All individuals and entities in the UnitedStates who (1) own, have owned, or otherwise have the right to enforce licensingrights to goods and services bearing trademarks or service marks registered withthe United States Patent and Trademark Office, (2) engage or have engaged incommercial transactions in Second Life associated with such registered trademarkor service marks, and (3) whose trademarks and/or service marks were infringedin Second Life.c) The Copyright… [read post]
