Search for: "Matter of G. C. ,"
Results 2261 - 2280
of 4,013
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Dec 2013, 5:01 pm
., as in J 20/05, the filing of a divisional application (see also G 1/09 [3.2.5], and J 9/12 [3,5]). [read post]
22 Dec 2013, 5:01 pm
” [2.10] Thus, although the appellant cited G 2/92 to support its view that this opinion exclusively concerned the prohibition of pursuing a non-unitary application in respect of subject-matter in respect of which no search fees had been paid and did not concern the examination procedure and subject-matter for which the search fees have been paid, the scope of G 2/92 extends – as explained supra – beyond the… [read post]
21 Dec 2013, 4:31 am
C. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 5:01 pm
”The same wording was used in decisions G 4/93 [5] and G 1/99 [6.1].It is thus clear that the appeal proceedings aim at contesting a decision.[2.2.3] In decision G 1/99 [6.1] the EBA further pointed out that: “Indeed, issues outside the subject-matter of the decision under appeal are not part of the appeal. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 6:27 am
See, La Souveraine, Compagnie d’assurance générale v. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 1:52 am
The post In the Supreme Court w/c 16 December 2013 appeared first on UKSCBlog. [read post]
13 Dec 2013, 12:24 am
Yes: the entire website (Art. 8(4)) [would that be compliant with the idea of selective blocking, as recently addressed by AG Cruz Villalon in Case C- 314/12 Telekabel?]. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 4:42 am
At that time ALL relevant records MUST be delivered to IMR by the employer/carrier within the prescribed time frame.Any failure in that regard is simply a matter of delay and is covered by 4610.5(i):"(i) An employer shall not engage in any conduct that has the effect of delaying the independent review process. [read post]
10 Dec 2013, 5:01 pm
In particular, it is accepted that in the present case introducing a disclaimer for excluding subject-matter which would not be patentable under A 53(c) may not contravene A123(2). [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 2:14 am
G v Scottish Ministers & Anor, heard 7 – 8 October 2013. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 5:01 pm
Correction is then effected by way of a corrigendum or reprint of the entire specification, see EPC Guidelines C-V 10 (September 2013), last paragraph. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 5:00 am
In re Hayden C. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 4:47 am
§ 1030(g). [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 1:14 am
G v Scottish Ministers & Anor, heard 7 – 8 October 2013. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 1:14 am
G v Scottish Ministers & Anor, heard 7 – 8 October 2013. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 2:39 am
G v Scottish Ministers & Anor, heard 7 – 8 October 2013. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 2:39 am
G v Scottish Ministers & Anor, heard 7 – 8 October 2013. [read post]
22 Nov 2013, 12:27 pm
CPL 170.40 permits dismissal of an information, even though there is no legal basis for such dismissal, as a matter of judicial discretion "by the existence of some compelling factor" that clearly demonstrates that conviction "would constitute or result in injustice." [read post]
21 Nov 2013, 10:30 am
But that was not the end of the matter. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 2:26 am
G v Scottish Ministers & Anor, heard 7 – 8 October 2013. [read post]
