Search for: "Matter of M C B" Results 2261 - 2280 of 3,550
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Oct 2012, 7:05 pm by admin
____________________ For more information about our regulatory law services contact us: contact For more regulatory law updates follow us on Twitter: @CanadaAttorney Preferences Preferences Preferences Preferences Preferences § 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 - = Backspace Tab q w e r t y u i o p [ ] Return capslock a s d f g h j k l ; ‘ \ shift ` z x c v b n m , . / shift English Deutsch Español Français … [read post]
16 Oct 2012, 12:00 pm by Andrew Langille
 The other key point is subsection 2(1)(e) of the regulations which reads "as a student in training for an occupation mentioned in clause (a), (b), (c), or (d)". [read post]
14 Oct 2012, 10:01 pm by Neil Cahn
Under the Child Support Standards Act (D.R.L. 240[1-b][c][7] and F.C.A. 413[c][7]) the court may award educational expenses: Where the court determines, having regard for the circumstances of the case and of the respective parties and in the best interests of the child, and as justice requires, that the present or future provision of post-secondary, private, special, or enriched education for the child is appropriate. [read post]
8 Oct 2012, 10:19 pm by Jeff Gamso
  It's absolutely unambiguous.The Constitution says that the federal government can do A, B, C, and D. [read post]
2 Oct 2012, 8:38 am by Jordan Furlong
Accordingly, lawyer advertising seeks to inform the inevitable client ahead of time that (a) the firm exists, (b) it provides services in this area, and (c) it can be trusted to help. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 4:13 pm by NL
C. v Renshaw [1992] 1 All ER 925, as approved in Birmingham City Council v Walker [2007] UKHL 22, [2007] 2 AC 262 makes clear that s.88(1)(b) only considers a joint tenant as a successor (in a joint to sole tenancy) where the joint tenant remained in occupation and could satisfy the secure tenancy requirements. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 4:13 pm by NL
C. v Renshaw [1992] 1 All ER 925, as approved in Birmingham City Council v Walker [2007] UKHL 22, [2007] 2 AC 262 makes clear that s.88(1)(b) only considers a joint tenant as a successor (in a joint to sole tenancy) where the joint tenant remained in occupation and could satisfy the secure tenancy requirements. [read post]
9 Sep 2012, 8:15 pm by tekEditor
In 1994, Jobs announced he was firing a quarter of the Lisa computer team, telling them, “You guys failed … Too many people here are B or C players. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 8:56 am by Todd Mintz
It made the front page of Digg (back when it mattered) and was hugely successful. [read post]