Search for: "Matter of Thomas J." Results 2261 - 2280 of 2,763
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Dec 2010, 4:00 am by Mandelman
IN CASE YOUR INTERESTED At 49 years old, and having originally founded my firm back in 1989, it’s been some time since I’ve been asked for a resume, as one might imagine. [read post]
4 Dec 2010, 8:00 am by Kent Scheidegger
Collins, 506 U.S. 461, 500 (1993) (Thomas, J., concurring).)The tension between Lockett and Jurek was not fully resolved for many years. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 12:50 pm by Daniel E. Cummins
Ickes, a panel of the court reversed the entry of summary judgment in favor of the defendants, finding that a defect in their sidewalk was not so obviously trivial as a matter of law to allow for a dismissal o [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 3:20 am by SHG
“As I experienced it during this trial, I think there’s a real danger that the inclusion of new technology in the courtroom is affecting an individual’s fair-trial rights,” said Thomas J. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 7:35 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Note also that the same issue is going up on appeal in the separate cases of the Philadelphia County matter of Thomas v. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 11:06 am by The Legal Blog
Justice Muralidhar of the Delhi High Court has discussed the Law relating to Jurisdiction of Courts while dealing with a Passing Off action involving the use of an universally accessible web site. [read post]
28 Nov 2010, 4:51 pm by INFORRM
  The matter was stayed by Mrs Justice Sharp on 22 October 2010 but has now been listed for trial. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 9:15 am by Kevin O'Keefe
123, or 62%, of the 2010 AmLaw 200 law firms are now blogging. [read post]
21 Nov 2010, 4:38 pm by INFORRM
  One of his topics was why Twitter matters for media organisations – including a list of 15 things that Twitter does effectively. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 1:08 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
& Plastics Corp., 75 AD2d 720 [1980]; Matter of Roland [Deak], 10 AD2d 263, 265 [1960]) or to preserve evidence for a forthcoming lawsuit (see generally Matter of Thomas v New York City Tr. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 11:29 am by Gritsforbreakfast
For that matter, if someone wanted to make it falsely appear that the right urn was the source of balls that were really handpicked from the left, they would successfully fool others 98% of the time if they made sure their "random" pickings mirrored a right-urn pattern. [read post]
7 Nov 2010, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
Bowker v Royal Society for the Protection of Birds, heard 21 October 2010 (Sharp J). [read post]