Search for: "People v Weeks" Results 2261 - 2280 of 15,550
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Feb 2014, 3:59 am by Timothy P. Flynn
FlynnOral argument is scheduled in the Michigan Supreme Court for March 6th in the juvenile lifer case of People v Raymond Carp to determine whether the SCOTUS decisions banning state juvenile lifer laws should get retroactive application. [read post]
15 May 2020, 10:14 am by Sophie Corke
This Kat is trying to avoid copyright liabilityWelcome to this week's roundup of recent stories and commentary from around the IP blogosphere.PatentsGermany's Federal Court of Justice handed down a potentially extremely significant judgment for SEP/FRAND in Europe, in the case of SISVEL v Haier. [read post]
8 Mar 2014, 11:36 pm by Mark Summerfield
Last week, this question was addressed in a decision of Justice Flick in the Federal Court of Australia: MPEG LA, L.L.C. v Regency Media Pty Ltd [2014] FCA 180, at [15]That object and purpose, at least in part, is to prevent the holder of a patent from taking potentially unfair advantage of the statutory monopoly conferred by a patent after it has expired. [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 6:49 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Legal pluralism and indigenous peoples rights: Challenges in litigation and recognition of indigenous peoples rights. [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 3:41 am
 The population of the city is 51,000, about the same as the number of people who torture themselves every week or so by going to a Browns game.) [read post]
16 Apr 2020, 7:16 am by Goldstein & Stamm, P.A.
Last week, the Supreme Court announced an 8-1 decision, authored by Justice Thomas, in the case of Kansas v. [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 2:27 pm
Supreme Court will hear argument in Federal Communications Commission v. [read post]
26 Feb 2008, 7:57 am
Be on the lookout tomorrow for an update on the Supreme Court's hearing of the Exxon Valdez oil spill case, Exxon Shipping v. [read post]
11 Apr 2008, 10:57 am
This time, I turn to his decision from Wednesday in Federal Insurance Co. v. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 6:58 pm by Sam Ritchie, ACLU
Just a few weeks after a fantastic piece outlining the struggle for marriage rights – and quoting the ACLU LGBT Project’s very own James Esseks – the New York Times today published an editorial in support of our challenge to the Defense of Marriage Act, Windsor v. [read post]