Search for: "Power v. Holder"
Results 2261 - 2280
of 2,842
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Oct 2010, 2:35 pm
ARMIGER, Appellant, v. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 1:41 am
Indústria e Comércio v OHIM, Consorci de l'Espai Rural de Gallecs (Class 46) CFI: John Deere prevails before CFI with colour combination mark: BCS v OHIM, Deere (Class 46) (IPKat) CFI finds trademarks containing common element in identical font confusingly similar in Aldi Einkauf GmbH & Co v Goya Importaciones y Distribuciones (Class 46) CFI: RNAiFect and RNActive: who would get confused? [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 1:41 am
Indústria e Comércio v OHIM, Consorci de l'Espai Rural de Gallecs (Class 46) CFI: John Deere prevails before CFI with colour combination mark: BCS v OHIM, Deere (Class 46) (IPKat) CFI finds trademarks containing common element in identical font confusingly similar in Aldi Einkauf GmbH & Co v Goya Importaciones y Distribuciones (Class 46) CFI: RNAiFect and RNActive: who would get confused? [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 1:41 am
Indústria e Comércio v OHIM, Consorci de l'Espai Rural de Gallecs (Class 46) CFI: John Deere prevails before CFI with colour combination mark: BCS v OHIM, Deere (Class 46) (IPKat) CFI finds trademarks containing common element in identical font confusingly similar in Aldi Einkauf GmbH & Co v Goya Importaciones y Distribuciones (Class 46) CFI: RNAiFect and RNActive: who would get confused? [read post]
3 May 2015, 9:23 am
Beastie Boys v. [read post]
14 Apr 2017, 6:07 am
Even if substantive consolidation proves unavailable, the oversight board or the Commonwealth may still seek to confirm a joint plan of adjustment for the Commonwealth and related issuers of Commonwealth debt by using PROMESA’s incorporated cramdown power, arguing that it can be imposed on all holders of Commonwealth debt so long as one impaired class of creditors of a single Commonwealth issuer votes to approve the plan. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 1:18 pm
A certain amount of caution on the part of financial institutions is understandable: When someone steps forward claiming to represent the account holder, the financial institution wants to verify that the attorney-in-fact indeed has the authority to act for the principal. [read post]
7 May 2012, 3:00 am
Contrast that to the Court’s more recent decision in MGM v. [read post]
24 Sep 2009, 9:14 am
See, e.g., Perfect 10, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Dec 2018, 4:14 pm
Global technology firms must recognise their great power and demonstrate their readiness to accept their great responsibility as holders of influence; iv. [read post]
19 Feb 2017, 9:02 pm
Not necessarily.Rumors have been circulating that the new EO will apply the same criteria as EO 13769 but expressly exempt green card holders, student visa holders, and other people with substantial contacts with the United States. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 10:04 pm
In US v. [read post]
30 Mar 2022, 9:52 am
By virtue of OBG Ltd v Allan [2007] UKHL 21 and Your Response Ltd v Datateam Business Media Ltd [2014] EWCA Civ 281, a trade document in electronic form is intangible and, therefore, not possessable and capable of functioning as a paper trade document. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 2:54 pm
Winstar Corp., 518 U.S. 839 (1996) and Cherokee Nation v. [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 5:01 am
Supreme Court case Holder v. [read post]
3 Apr 2022, 8:50 pm
In R. v. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 10:14 am
In Shapiro v. [read post]
21 Dec 2012, 5:15 pm
This bill places the ability for determining who may be appointed by the Governor with the political party leadership of the vacating office holder. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 11:00 am
” CTS Corp. v. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 11:54 am
Cooper v. [read post]
