Search for: "Power-One Inc. v. United States" Results 2261 - 2280 of 3,369
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Oct 2012, 8:19 am by Chris Castle
  Proponents of this fallacy (such as the sponsors of the IRFA bill) leave out the July 6, 2012 ruling of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in Intercollegiate Broadcasting System Inc v. [read post]
8 Oct 2012, 1:43 pm by Glenn
A colleague of mine, whose views on this topic differ, suggested in a debate recently that United States v. [read post]
4 Oct 2012, 12:24 pm by Glenn
Even if they are correct, the parties pressing for government antitrust action against Google cannot claim the courts have ever recognized the concept of natural monopoly as a surrogate for the United States v. [read post]
29 Sep 2012, 7:10 am
The Supreme Court of the United States has announced the cases it will review, and one of those is a sexual harassment case out of Indiana. [read post]
28 Sep 2012, 2:21 pm by paperstreet
Ill. 1993) (holding that the privacy interests of an individual whose conversations come under the power of another are implicated “even if the individual was assured no one would listen to his conversations, because the individual’s privacy interests are no longer autonomous”); see also United States v. [read post]
24 Sep 2012, 1:17 pm by WIMS
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
20 Sep 2012, 9:24 am by Sheppard Mullin
By Tyler Baker and Ted Max On September 5, 2012, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit issued its long-awaited and highly anticipated decision in Christian Louboutin S.A. v. [read post]
19 Sep 2012, 10:44 am by Sheppard Mullin
By Tyler Baker and Ted Max On September 5, 2012, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit issued its long-awaited and highly anticipated decision in Christian Louboutin S.A. v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 12:14 pm by Kiran Bhat
United States, a challenge to the use of a state burglary conviction as a basis for enhancing a sentence for a federal crime under the Armed Career Criminal Act. [read post]