Search for: "Publications International, Ltd." Results 2261 - 2280 of 3,182
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Feb 2018, 4:57 pm by INFORRM
On 8 February 2018 Dingemans J heard an application in the case of Bokova v Associated Newspapers Ltd. [read post]
15 Sep 2015, 5:53 am by Jack Goldsmith
 government has once again decided not to impose sanctions on China or its companies for their massive public and private cyber thefts. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 9:00 am
Software Pty Ltd v Bing Technologies Pty Limited (No 1) (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog) Australian Bureau of Statistics going CC, under attribution-only licence (Creative Commons) (Michael Geist)   Canada Depreciation a possible ground in opposition proceedings: Parmalat Canada Inc v Sysco Corporation (Canadian Trademark Blog) Trademarks Office considers changes to opposition practice (International Law Office) Parody defence not available according to BC Supreme Court:… [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 12:55 am by Michael Douglas
Rares J dissented in holding that it was contrary to public policy to permit contracting out of that class actions regime. [read post]
And if confirmed, Jackson would become the first Black woman and the first former federal public defender to serve in the U.S. [read post]
3 Dec 2022, 7:08 am
For these reasons, I find that the restrictions imposed by sections 9 and 10 of the Crimes Ordinance on the right to freedoms of expression and publication are necessary for the protection of national security and protection of public order (ordre public). [read post]
1 Feb 2008, 12:00 am
: Industries Ltd v Dynamic Supply Pty Ltd: (IP Down Under)BrazilIFPI raids hundreds of internet cafes: 600 cops, one arrest: (Ars Technica)CanadaInterlocutory injunctions in trade mark cases: a difficult test to meet: CMAC Mortgages v Canadian Mortgage Expert Centre and CanadaHyundai Autov Cross Canada Auto Body Supply: (Canadian Trademark Blog), (coverage of Hyundia - IPblog), Privacy Coalition warns on copyright reform: (Michael Geist),Wikinomics on… [read post]
1 May 2022, 4:30 pm by INFORRM
The piece notes that neither judgment fully explains the reasoning behind their decisions, despite there being significant public interest in the outcome. [read post]
29 May 2022, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
This includes the new requirement of serious harm to reputation and the new public interest defence. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 12:46 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Nationally recognized for her extensive work, publications and leadership on HIPAA and other privacy and data security concerns, Ms. [read post]
11 Feb 2012, 1:43 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
Any such dispute which has not been amicably settled may, if both Parties agree, be submitted;(a) for resolution, in accordance with the law of the Contracting Party which has admitted the investment to that Contracting Party's competent judicial or administrative bodies; or(b) to international conciliation under the Conciliation Rules of the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law.3. [read post]
20 May 2018, 4:13 pm by INFORRM
The Brett Wilson Media Law Blog has considered how unjustified threats of legal action may amount to harassment illustrated by the recent case of Worthington & Anor v Metropolitan Housing Trust Ltd [2018] EWCA Civ 1125. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 12:23 am by Kelly
William Bounds, Ltd (Docket Report) District Court N D Illinois: False patent marking plaintiff must meet rule 9(b) pleading for intent: Simonian v. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 10:59 pm by INFORRM
This was not disclosed in the public version of the judgment for the reasons summarised by the House of Lords in Cream Holdings Ltd v Banerjee [2005] 1 AC 253 at [26], namely so as not to pre-empt publication and because doing so would mean that the Claimant “[...] could not bring an action at all without disclosing his private or confidential information, and so defeating the purpose of the proceedings. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 12:11 am by INFORRM
” (Rothermere v Times Newspapers Ltd[1973] 1 WLR) The trial of the “Seven Bishops” ((1688) 3 Mod.Rep. 212 pdf) is generally taught as establishing this constitutional right as part of the story of Britain’s political progress. [read post]