Search for: "Robert Rule"
Results 2261 - 2280
of 29,626
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Feb 2023, 8:09 am
Baird, Robert H. [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 11:25 am
Robert Chesney shared “Cyberspace and Instability,” his new edited volume with James Shires and Max Smeets. [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 4:44 am
Putting aside the idiosyncratic chapter by the late Professor Berger, most of the third edition of the Reference Manual presented guidance on many important issues. [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 3:00 am
In 2019, Justice Elena Kagan told a congressional committee that Chief Justice John Roberts was “seriously” studying the issue. [read post]
9 Feb 2023, 10:18 am
Chief Justice Roberts asked about an accountant who completes a complicated return. [read post]
9 Feb 2023, 9:17 am
Lawfare Founding Editor Robert Chesney has a new edited collection, “Cyberspace and Instability,” published by Edinburgh University Press with co-editors James Shires and Max Smeets. [read post]
9 Feb 2023, 8:55 am
This Article provides the first empirical and doctrinal analysis of how the modern Supreme Court uses the common law to determine statutory meaning, based on a study of 602 statutory cases decided during the Roberts Court’s first fourteen and a half Terms. [read post]
9 Feb 2023, 7:39 am
Here’s the Thursday morning read: Supreme Court justices discussed, but did not agree on, code of conduct (Robert Barnes & Ann E. [read post]
9 Feb 2023, 7:00 am
There are several areas of subject matter that are excluded from patentability, and this particular sub-section excludes any “scheme, rule or method for performing a mental act, playing a game or doing business, or a program for a computer”. [read post]
9 Feb 2023, 4:38 am
Jasmine Cameron-Chileshe, George Parker, John Paul Rathbone, Robert Wright and Roman Olearchyk report for the Financial Times. [read post]
7 Feb 2023, 1:08 pm
In Part One of our in-depth look at these proposed changes, host Scott Mallery is joined by experts Daniel Hart and Robert Milligan to discuss the fundamentals of non-compete agreements and what the rule’s adoption would mean for employers. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 9:00 pm
In two decisions rendered on January 11, 2023, the French Supreme Court (“Cour de cassation”) ruled for the third time in almost 50 years on the patentability of computer-implemented inventions. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 5:59 am
Robert Brammer, chief, Law Library of Congress Office of External Relations: I will always remember Margaret for her sense of humor and how dedicated she was to her work. [read post]
5 Feb 2023, 5:33 pm
Campaign Finance National: “Federal Election Commission Hikes Contribution Limits Ahead of 2024 Election Cycle” by Taylor Giorno for OpenSecrets Illinois: “New Illinois Supreme Court Justices Got Major Boost from Hidden Spending by Democratic Group” by Ray Long and Rick Pearson (Chicago Tribune) for MSN North Dakota: “Opposites Align in Push to Clamp Down on Dark Money in North Dakota Campaigns” by Jeremy Turley for Dickinson Press Elections National: “DNC… [read post]
5 Feb 2023, 3:10 pm
District Court for the Southern District of Iowa (“Aérospatiale”), the Supreme Court addressed blocking statutes, holding that they “do not deprive an American court of the power to order a party subject to its jurisdiction to produce evidence even though the act of production may violate that statute,” and laid out a balancing test for courts to use in determining whether to order cross-border discovery.[3] (The factors in this balancing test are also codified in the… [read post]
5 Feb 2023, 9:08 am
” The jury ruled in favor of American Home Assurance Company in the claims practice lawsuit brought by Robert Sebo. [read post]
4 Feb 2023, 4:38 pm
The Food Safety Set: 21 People Who Have Shaped the Last 30 Years of Food Safety In the 30 years since the Jack in the Box outbreak, food safety has come a long way. [read post]
4 Feb 2023, 12:16 pm
A Few Words for a Lost Friend: Tribute to Dmitry Karshtedt (Bob Brauneis, Mark Lemley, Jake Sherkow) Closing Plenary Session: Fair use Robert Brauneis, Copyright Transactions in the Shadow of Fair Use Suppose a work does not infringe another work because and only because it’s been ruled a fair use. [read post]
4 Feb 2023, 7:38 am
Evidence shows greater tendency to infringe among men; women are less likely to “break rules. [read post]
4 Feb 2023, 6:30 am
For the Balkinization 20th Anniversary Symposium Linda C. [read post]
