Search for: "STATE v CLARK" Results 2261 - 2280 of 3,829
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Feb 2012, 12:14 pm by Roy Ginsburg
  Regards, Roy] Introduction On January 11, 2012, the United States Supreme Court issued what commentators have hailed as a “sweeping” decision in Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church & School v. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 9:45 am by admin
Drumroll, please…… Professor Nadine Strossen chose West Virginia State Board of Education v. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 2:36 pm by almaraz
Professor Steve Kanter teaches Constitutional Law at Lewis & Clark Law School. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 5:22 am by Blog Editorial
PP v Secretary of State for the Home Department, (formerly VV [Jordan]), PP v SSHD, W & BB v SSHD and Z, G, U & Y v SSHD, heard 30 – 31 January 2012. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 2:38 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Crawford & Anor v Suffolk Mental Health Partnership NHS Trust [2012] EWCA Civ 138 (17 February 2012) Oxford City Council v Basey [2012] EWCA Civ 115 (15 February 2012) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) AB & Anor v Home Office [2012] EWHC 226 (QB) (16 February 2012) Gold & Anor v Cox & Anor [2012] EWHC 272 (QB) (17 February 2012) Independent Police Complaints Commission v Warner & Ors… [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 11:29 am by Bexis
 “Fraud on the market” isn’t a state-law claim. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 3:00 am by Karen Tani
Clark’s groundbreaking studies on race and child development helped end segregation in the United States. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 2:15 am by Laura Sandwell
Starting on Monday 13 February 2012 is the two day appeal of R (on the application of ST (Eritrea)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department in front of a panel of seven (L Hale, L Hope, L Brown, L Mance, L Kerr, L Clarke and L Dyson). [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 8:24 am by Michael O'Hear
  (Our own Milwaukee County Sheriff David Clarke is an outspoken contemporary proponent of this point of view.) [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 9:41 am
Clark required that Texas courts must enforcewhatever TEC commands. [read post]