Search for: "STATE v. PHILLIPS"
Results 2261 - 2280
of 2,877
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Sep 2010, 7:13 am
Phillips of the Central of District California, based in Riverside, in the 86-page opinion issued yesterday in Log Cabin Republicans v. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 4:37 am
See also the decision in Commonwealth of Massachusetts v United States Department of Health and Human Services where in July a Federal Judge in Massachusetts ruled that legislation prohibiting the recognition of same-sex marriage was unconstitutional. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 8:28 pm
Phillips (C.D. [read post]
6 Sep 2010, 10:01 am
Phillips, 2010 WL 2787644 (N.Y. [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 3:35 am
Of course, this may not be that issue and the Supreme Court may just follow Lord Bingham in Kay v Lambeth. [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 8:45 am
Phillips notes that a New York appellate court, in Moore v. [read post]
28 Aug 2010, 1:00 am
See Phillips v. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 1:48 pm
State v. [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 3:53 am
” Gelman, Lax, and Phillips forecast that these trends will continue in the future, as the under-30 population shows majority support for gay marriage across all states. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 6:11 am
Image: Tina Phillips / FreeDigitalPhotos.net [read post]
22 Aug 2010, 7:26 pm
State v. [read post]
20 Aug 2010, 12:00 am
STATE v. [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 7:20 am
State, 73 Alabama, 366; State v. [read post]
17 Aug 2010, 3:30 am
” Phillips v. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 9:00 pm
Handley v New York State Teachers' Retirement Sys., 2010 NY Slip Op 04667, decided on June 3, 2010, Appellate Division, Third Department [5 proceedings] Brett A. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 5:00 am
Peter Phillips here and here. [read post]
7 Aug 2010, 2:08 pm
Ring Plus v. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 11:06 pm
See Phillips v. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 10:49 pm
(Docket Report) District Court Utah: Defendant’s inadequate data retention policies, loss of source code for patented software did not warrant terminating sanctions for spoliation: Phillip M. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 11:03 pm
Phillips v. [read post]
