Search for: "Shields v. State"
Results 2261 - 2280
of 5,103
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Nov 2016, 8:58 am
We’ve reported on the United States v. [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 10:18 pm
See, e.g., Gold v. [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 12:55 pm
While there are statutory exceptions that vary slightly from state to state, generally the government is shielded from legal action in the event that one of its representatives is found liable in a claim. [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 1:22 pm
In San Clemente Estates v. [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 11:41 am
The Supreme Court deadlocked in United States v. [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 7:07 am
The state appellate court court agreed, holding that the Internet disclosure provision was unconstitutional both on its face and as applied to defendant, but the Illinois Supreme Court overturned that decision and upheld the statute.* * This case is a close cousin of the case (North Carolina v. [read post]
30 Oct 2016, 5:05 pm
Lexology gives an update on the EU-US Privacy Shield. [read post]
27 Oct 2016, 2:45 pm
A California employer was faced with just that experience in Pierson v. [read post]
27 Oct 2016, 11:10 am
Helmerich & Payne points to the Supreme Court’s 1946 decision in Bell v. [read post]
24 Oct 2016, 9:01 pm
This rule both cements the tie between husband and child and provides a protective shield against claims by donors. [read post]
23 Oct 2016, 3:54 pm
And Article V enables the states, by “the Application of the Legislatures of two thirds of the several States,” to require Congress to call a Constitutional Convention. [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 9:10 am
Conceding that no cases were directly on point, Connell cites United States v. [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 3:20 am
The judge denied the motion by handwritten order (read here) stating simply that the petitioner failed to demonstrate grounds for reconsideration. [read post]
13 Oct 2016, 2:06 pm
All of those other states say that, yep, the landowner can be liable in such a setting, even in states that have their own analogue to Section 846.But not here in California. [read post]
12 Oct 2016, 4:54 am
What this mantra fails to take into account is that when they put on a shield, they are no longer Just “people,” subject to whatever foibles people suffer, but agents of the state imbued with enormous authority over others. [read post]
10 Oct 2016, 10:25 am
For example, in Fletcher v. [read post]
8 Oct 2016, 5:22 pm
In Ciurelo v. [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 4:13 pm
In Nguyen v. [read post]
5 Oct 2016, 4:17 am
Facts: This case (Sims v. [read post]
4 Oct 2016, 4:29 pm
., Inc. v. [read post]
