Search for: "State v. Brain " Results 2261 - 2280 of 2,675
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Dec 2009, 7:33 am by Moseley Collins
THE AUTHORITIES CITED BY THE DEFENSE ARE NOT APPLICABLE TO THE FACTS OF THIS CASE Defendants' reliance on Kennemur v. [read post]
19 Dec 2009, 1:04 pm by Kenneth Vercammen
In reaching this conclusion, the trial court relied on what it characterized as the "procedures" mandated by the Supreme Court in State v. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 2:06 pm by Richard E. Vollertsen
All the while there is an unsettling and nagging question in the back of our brains about whether generics are truly equivalent. [read post]
8 Dec 2009, 7:33 pm
New York State courts have adopted a rule known as "the Noseworthy Doctrine" (first established in the case of Noseworthy v City of New York, 298 NY 76), which permits the jury to draw an inference in favor of the dead victim of a car accident such as this one. [read post]
8 Dec 2009, 7:33 pm
New York State courts have adopted a rule known as "the Noseworthy Doctrine" (first established in the case of Noseworthy v City of New York, 298 NY 76), which permits the jury to draw an inference in favor of the dead victim of a car accident such as this one. [read post]
5 Dec 2009, 10:02 am
This morning’s papers across the United States are covered with paralyzed, former dancer, Stephanie Smith’s battle against food giant, Cargill. [read post]
24 Nov 2009, 9:39 am
Definition of Attendant Care I just read the recently released decision Villafor v. [read post]