Search for: "State v. Daniels" Results 2261 - 2280 of 5,106
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Dec 2014, 4:00 am by Administrator
Daniels, 2014 FCA 101 (35945) Nov. 20, 2014 Are Métis/Non-Status Indians a federal or provincial jurisdiction. [read post]
3 Mar 2018, 10:17 am by William Ford
” In preparation for oral arguments in United States v. [read post]
14 Dec 2005, 3:40 pm
Sobre "Recurso de hecho deducido por el defensor oficial de Daniel Enrique Maldonado en la causa Maldonado, Daniel Enrique y otro s/ robo agravado por el uso de armas en concurso real con homicidio calificado —causa N ° 1174—"Corte Suprema de la Nación7 de diciembre de 2005La semana pasada la CSN finalmente se pronunció en una sentencia que tenía en carpeta desde hace tiempo, en el que se… [read post]
24 Mar 2024, 6:50 pm
The Court concluded there were extensive human rights violations and ordered the State to provide specialized medical assistance to the victims, pay compensation for both material losses and pain and suffering, and publicly acknowledge its wrongdoing. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 6:45 am by Kiran Bhat
Savage of the Los Angeles Times , Carlos Ball in the Huffington Post, Daniel B. [read post]
21 Nov 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The CBA further provides that the CSEA may request arbitration with respect to a grievance, but no provision in the CBA permits an employee to request arbitration, nor is there a provision that makes the employees a party to the collective bargaining agreement (see generally Matter of Case v Monroe Community Coll., 89 NY2d 438, 442-443 [1997]; Matter of Diaz v Pilgrim State Psychiatric Ctr. of State of N.Y., 62 NY2d 693, 695 [1984]). [read post]
21 Nov 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The CBA further provides that the CSEA may request arbitration with respect to a grievance, but no provision in the CBA permits an employee to request arbitration, nor is there a provision that makes the employees a party to the collective bargaining agreement (see generally Matter of Case v Monroe Community Coll., 89 NY2d 438, 442-443 [1997]; Matter of Diaz v Pilgrim State Psychiatric Ctr. of State of N.Y., 62 NY2d 693, 695 [1984]). [read post]
26 May 2019, 2:13 pm
Still Eleonora writes about an error in the Italian translation of the directive spotted by Valentina Borgese, Carmine Di Benedetto, Daniele Cerulla and Daniele Fabris.IPR Carousel Kat friend Matthieu Dhenne discusses the Paris Court of Appeal's decision in Conversant v LG which provides an interesting discussion on essentiality and the application of the new French Trade Secrets Act. [read post]
28 May 2015, 9:00 am by Amy Howe
United States ex rel. [read post]