Search for: "State v. Holderness"
Results 2261 - 2280
of 8,247
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Mar 2018, 7:00 am
Supreme Court issued its decision in Jennings v. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 6:54 am
A shareholder class action alleging that the defendants falsely stated that a financial company maintained its principal executive offices in the United States in order to satisfy the criteria for inclusion in the Russell 2000 Index, a small cap stock market index, so as to allow the firm to maintain its listing on the Nasdaq moves on (Desta v. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 3:15 am
The CJEU noted that, if found otherwise, this would lead to an "absurd result": the subsequent registration of a design, obtained despite the earlier disclosure of an identical design intended to be incorporated in or applied to a different product, would allow the holder of the subsequent registration to prohibit the use of the same design for the product, which was the subject of the earlier disclosure.Nintendo v. [read post]
3 Mar 2018, 9:54 am
Microsoft v. [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 12:25 pm
(See Goldman v. [read post]
1 Mar 2018, 11:23 am
Wheeler, 254 U.S. 281, 293 (1920); Saenz v. [read post]
1 Mar 2018, 6:10 am
The post Fair Dealing Support for News Reporting and Public Debate: The Case of Warman and National Post v. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 1:26 pm
United States v. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 8:09 am
V. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 3:49 am
Unlike the LLC statutes in many other states, New York’s LLC Law does not authorize the LLC or any of its members to seek judicial expulsion of another member, no matter how egregious the member’s behavior. [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 10:00 am
Circuit in People's Mojahedin Org. of Iran v. [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 6:10 am
The implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing was recently addressed by Vice Chancellor Glasscock in the decision of Miller v. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 10:30 am
The University of Chicago no longer is in danger of losing ancient Iranian artifacts following Wednesday's United States Supreme Court decision in the case of Jenny Rubin, et al. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 8:50 am
Note: For those lawyers among our readers, the District Court decision is Justin Goldman v. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 7:34 am
Art 8 of GDPR states that if a child is under age of 16 then it requires parental consent but that this default age for lawful consent may be lowered by individual member states down to minimum of 13. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 6:00 am
United States v. [read post]
20 Feb 2018, 8:14 am
Co. v. [read post]
20 Feb 2018, 4:00 am
On February 13, 2018, in Forman v. [read post]
19 Feb 2018, 7:57 am
Although it is unclear precisely what standard the Appellate Division applied, it cited its prior decision in Tapp v New York State Urban Dev. [read post]
18 Feb 2018, 6:01 am
Holder (invalidating Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act) and Stenberg v. [read post]
