Search for: "State v. Lord"
Results 2261 - 2280
of 3,609
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Aug 2012, 2:00 am
The Ontario courts have followed the UK decision of Letterstedt v. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 2:00 am
The Ontario courts have followed the UK decision of Letterstedt v. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 10:01 am
The constitutional importance of this point is clear: in R (on the application of Bancoult) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, which was cited by Lord Pannick on behalf of Gina Miller during his oral submissions, Lord Hoffmann held that ‘the unique authority Parliament derives from its representative character’. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 11:39 am
Courts Ruling: § 93A, Breach Of Contract, and Willful Violation Causation Under § 93A Examining Lord v. [read post]
22 Oct 2020, 4:43 pm
Their reaction to the post is impressionistic and fleeting’ (Lord Kerr, para. 44; see also Monir v Wood [2018] EWHC 3525, [90] Nicklin J). [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 6:35 am
However, none of these highly defamatory rumours will be published by Scottish Law Reporter.BIG NAMES, BIG SHAME, AND LEVY MCRAEFormer Lord Advocate now Dame Elish Angiolini employed Levy McRae to go after anti abuse campaigner. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 3:24 am
In their submissions to the Expert Group, the Scottish Government and the Lord Advocate had called for appeals to the Supreme Court in criminal cases to be ended altogether, so Salmond was no doubt hoping that this is what the Review Group (headed by Lord McCluskey) would recommend. [read post]
[Guest post] How much is that SEP in the window? 5 Themes from the IPKat/LSE Nokia v Daimler seminar
5 Jul 2021, 7:40 am
However, Eeva disagreed, stating that in her view the ETSI principle was to license end products and that was how IPR holders had always understood it. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 6:51 am
The Court considered R (on the application of Zoolife International Limited) v Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs [2007] EWHC 2995 (Admin) on the issue of hearing academic cases. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 6:51 am
The Court considered R (on the application of Zoolife International Limited) v Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs [2007] EWHC 2995 (Admin) on the issue of hearing academic cases. [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 4:52 pm
It is also worth recalling the words of Lord Atkin in Ley v Hamilton (1935) 153 LT 384 at 386: It is precisely because the real damage cannot be ascertained and established that the damages are at large. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 11:25 am
State of Haryana, (1993) 3 SCC 114, at page 120, this Court stated the importance of consistent opinions in achieving harmony in Judicial System:"10. [read post]
28 May 2023, 12:15 am
However, I understand the confusion and I thank the noble Lords who have raised these amendments. [read post]
30 Nov 2014, 3:58 pm
Lord Collins also ruled in favour of the appellant, noting that he was “struck by the chilling effect on the exercise of lawful rights such a deployment would have. [read post]
30 Nov 2014, 3:58 pm
Lord Collins also ruled in favour of the appellant, noting that he was “struck by the chilling effect on the exercise of lawful rights such a deployment would have. [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 12:33 am
This has been solidified ever since the House of Lords pronounced its decision in Caparo Industries Plc v. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 1:59 am
Section 32 was criticised as by amongst others Lord Lester, at the time that the Data Protection Bill was being considered, for not properly importing the test of “objective necessity” required by the Directive (see also our posts here and here). [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 1:59 am
Section 32 was criticised as by amongst others Lord Lester, at the time that the Data Protection Bill was being considered, for not properly importing the test of “objective necessity” required by the Directive (see also our posts here and here). [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 1:59 am
Section 32 was criticised as by amongst others Lord Lester, at the time that the Data Protection Bill was being considered, for not properly importing the test of “objective necessity” required by the Directive (see also our posts here and here). [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 11:58 pm
The Secretary of State for the Home Department v Hassan Abdi and Afrah Khalaf [2010] EWHC 3083 (Admin) The Court of Appeal decided that time spent appealing against deportation counts in assessing whether an individual has been detained for an unreasonably long period. [read post]
