Search for: "State v. Mark"
Results 2261 - 2280
of 19,834
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jan 2013, 4:08 pm
This recommendation is not legally binding on Member States. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 5:30 am
Bus. v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 6:46 pm
What most people will take away from Harris v. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 2:04 pm
Arizona, 520 U.S. 43, 77 (1997) (internal quotation marks omitted). [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 12:27 am
Also, GAC had had registrations for "BIOFORCE" and "SENTALLOY" in the United States whereas the Proprietor did not have any registration for the said marks anywhere in the world. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 4:05 am
"] USA Marble, LLC v. [read post]
9 Sep 2019, 12:21 pm
September marks the beginning of the academic year and an official end to the summer break. [read post]
28 May 2009, 5:42 pm
State v. [read post]
21 Jan 2012, 12:54 pm
In Holding Company of the Villages, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 3:03 am
ITEX Corp. v. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 11:57 am
See State v. [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 12:32 pm
3.State v. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 8:28 am
Christian Louboutin S.A. v. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 2:29 pm
The TTAB affirmed the USPTO denial of the mark stating that 15 U.S.C. [read post]
19 Aug 2024, 3:57 am
State Permits, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Aug 2020, 8:21 am
Longarzo * DMCA’s Unhelpful 512(f) Preempts Helpful State Law Claims–Stevens v. [read post]
13 Sep 2021, 2:04 pm
In State v. [read post]
31 May 2011, 9:00 am
The Treaty marks a significant step in bilateral cooperation between the United States and Paraguay. [read post]
4 Mar 2008, 12:37 am
The State (Trinidad And Tobago) [2008] UKPC 16 (3 March 2008) Knight v. [read post]
6 Jun 2014, 12:55 am
Following the Advocate General’s opinion [on which see Jeremy’s post here], yesterday the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) rendered its decision in Case C-360/12 Coty Germany GmbH v First Note Perfumes NV. [read post]
