Search for: "State v. Money"
Results 2261 - 2280
of 20,452
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Apr 2011, 3:25 am
., Co. v. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 12:00 pm
He invited the jurors to ask themselves "What is the money used for?" [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 5:00 am
In Lueras v. [read post]
2 Aug 2024, 7:42 am
Goliath v. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 4:38 pm
I won't continue to belabor the details of these cases unnecessarily, but in United States v. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 4:00 am
Published reports citing court filings stated that company executives met with the mediator in a full-day session, followed by a number of phone calls, without success. [read post]
24 Nov 2008, 7:21 am
In opposition to the State Farm defendants' motion, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact (see Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320). [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 2:27 am
He stated that the judgments in Johnson and Eastwood v Magnox Electric plc; Cornwall County Court v McCabe [2004] UKHL 35 both recognised that provisions in the ERA did not supersede an employee’s common law and contractual rights and he allowed the appeal. [read post]
2 Apr 2008, 6:00 am
" (Cortez v. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 5:06 pm
One is Republican Party v. [read post]
29 Sep 2007, 11:00 pm
For example, in Dempster v. [read post]
6 Dec 2007, 12:42 am
Cooper v. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 4:00 am
Citing Matter of DeLuca v New York State & Local Employees' Retirement Sys., 48 AD3d 876, the Appellate Division explained that "[I]t is the Comptroller's duty to determine retirement service credits and his determination will be upheld by this Court if rational and supported by substantial evidence" and it is the claimant's burden to show that he or she is entitled to additional retirement member service credit.According to the decision, Petitioner had… [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 4:00 am
Citing Matter of DeLuca v New York State & Local Employees' Retirement Sys., 48 AD3d 876, the Appellate Division explained that "[I]t is the Comptroller's duty to determine retirement service credits and his determination will be upheld by this Court if rational and supported by substantial evidence" and it is the claimant's burden to show that he or she is entitled to additional retirement member service credit.According to the decision, Petitioner had… [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 3:10 pm
The district court was not clearly erroneous in finding that although Hurtado may have been a cog in some larger wheel, he was an essential cog who, solely for a sizeable sum of money, knowingly smuggled a large quantity of narcotics into the United States via a hidden compartment in his truck. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 1:55 pm
He's suing for a ton of money. [read post]
2 Oct 2024, 8:55 am
However, in its Consumer Financial Protection Bureau v. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 2:48 pm
After a six-day trial in Williamson v. [read post]
18 Oct 2023, 6:19 am
This ruling revives the plaintiff's state law claim even as it brings her federal equal pay claim to an end.The case is Eisenhauer v. [read post]
