Search for: "State v. Settle"
Results 2261 - 2280
of 15,653
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Mar 2022, 5:46 am
In Donohue v Cuomo, 2022 NY Slip Op 00910, the New York State's Court of Appeals said:"In Kolbe v Tibbetts, [it] left open whether a New York court should infer vesting of retiree health insurance rights when construing a collective bargaining agreement* (CBA) (see 22 NY3d 344, 354 [2013]). [read post]
16 Jul 2008, 7:51 am
The Heights at Issaquah Ridge Owners Association v. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 1:54 pm
" Gross v. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 12:47 pm
Jander suggested that the justices were not yet settled on a consensus resolution to this case. [read post]
6 Nov 2021, 5:29 am
Hofmann v. [read post]
20 May 2011, 9:43 am
Branch v. [read post]
17 Oct 2015, 6:33 am
It is styled, Renee Davis and Reginald Davis v. [read post]
8 May 2016, 7:01 am
Upholding the constitutional validity of the Act, and following State of A.P. v. [read post]
24 May 2015, 8:03 pm
In a rather scathing decision in Hurst v. [read post]
23 Jan 2010, 10:07 pm
United States v. [read post]
14 Jan 2018, 1:37 pm
”Pfizer, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Jul 2019, 12:49 pm
Fair agreed to settle the dispute, even if that settlement wasn't necessarily enforceable under Section 664.6. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 7:10 pm
In both cases, if they have enough assets, a probate court has to supervise the settling of the estate. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 1:57 pm
In today’s case (Norris v. [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 2:36 pm
” Nor is it in many other states. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 11:58 am
Private parties, of course, have every right to settle their cases. [read post]
28 May 2019, 8:09 am
Just how remarkable it was becomes apparent when it is contrasted with a decision of the United States Supreme Court just a year later, Adderly v. [read post]
13 Sep 2013, 6:00 am
Co., v. [read post]
28 May 2019, 8:09 am
Just how remarkable it was becomes apparent when it is contrasted with a decision of the United States Supreme Court just a year later, Adderly v. [read post]
24 May 2018, 10:50 pm
However, the judge stated that the “uncertain state of the law” meant that his conclusion on this point could only be provisional ([132]) until the CJEU gives guidance in Sky v SkyKick on what circumstances may constitute bad faith. [read post]
