Search for: "Taylor v. Taylor"
Results 2261 - 2280
of 4,755
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Feb 2014, 1:18 am
On Wednesday 5 February 2014 the Supreme Court will hand down judgment in the following: Adamson & Ors v Paddico Ltd; Taylor (on behalf of the Society for the Protection of Markham and Little Francis) v Betterment Properties Ltd; and Richardson & Anor v Director of Public Prosecutions. [read post]
20 Mar 2011, 9:57 am
State Senator Lena Taylor objected that the bill “breaks down the wall of independence around independent agencies. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 9:00 am
The Appellate Division rejected the Authority’s argument that “its action was a transfer permitted by Personnel Director rules without resort to a hearing” [Campbell v NYC Transit Authority, 253 AD2d 813], holding that Campbell was entitled to a Section 75 disciplinary hearing. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 3:22 pm
In Sella House Ltd v Mears [1989] 1 EGLR 65, Taylor LJ “stated that he would “require to see a clause in clear and unambiguous terms” before being persuaded the parties had intended that a tenant who paid his rent and service charges would be obliged to subsidise the landlord’s costs of proceedings against his fellow tenants who were defaulters” While Taylor LJ’s statement could perhaps not be the basis for argument that… [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 4:30 am
In 2016, responding to CACI’s argument that plaintiffs’ claims were non-justiciable under the political question doctrine, the Fourth Circuit reiterated its position in Taylor v. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 4:25 am
The rule of three was held valid by the Court of Appeals in People v Gaffney, 201 NY 535, a case decided in 1911. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 12:53 pm
” In Taylor v. [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 7:05 am
Chambers v. [read post]
15 Jul 2022, 6:44 am
IFG, 2021 ONSC 4042.[3] See Taylor v. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 11:16 am
Citizens United wasn’t a victory (or a defeat) for the Constitution — it was just a well-placed right hook in the long battle of campaign finance reform v. rich people and institutions doing whatever they want. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 8:05 am
The Supreme Court created the doctrine of qualified immunity in a 1967 decision in the case Pierson v. [read post]
31 Jan 2008, 1:34 am
In Mitchell v. [read post]
7 Apr 2017, 8:11 am
Summary judgment was also denied on the employee’s constructive discharge claim, and her claim for punitive damages (Creacy v. [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 3:24 am
Section 205(5)(d) places limits PERB’s authority and PERB does not have jurisdiction with respect to (a) enforcing the terms of an agreement between the parties, nor (b) considering alleged violations of a Taylor Law agreement.Reinstating the ruling by the Supreme Court, the Court of Appeals held that the district had violated the “unambiguous” terms of the Taylor Law agreement between the parties. [read post]
26 Jan 2021, 6:02 am
In Black v. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 3:48 am
The City of Plattsburgh and its police officers union agreed while negotiating their 1995-1998 Taylor Law contract to include a provision -- referred to as the “207-c benefits” -- in the agreement. [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 4:05 am
”The Cohoes decision, however, implies that light duty could be viewed as a “permissive subject” of collective bargaining under the Taylor Law and ultimately made subject to arbitration under the terms of the agreement. [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 5:25 pm
McKoy v. [read post]
