Search for: "True v True"
Results 2261 - 2280
of 33,926
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Apr 2023, 4:03 am
Image from D.A. v. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 3:25 am
The “akin to employment” expansion does not undermine the traditional position that there is no vicarious liability where the tortfeasor is a true independent contractor. [read post]
25 Apr 2023, 1:11 pm
See also ROONEY V. [read post]
25 Apr 2023, 12:16 pm
Scurry County and Montelongo v. [read post]
25 Apr 2023, 12:00 pm
Ltd. v. [read post]
25 Apr 2023, 11:24 am
Warren v. [read post]
25 Apr 2023, 8:47 am
To wrap things up in the week’s quick hits, Jay proposes updating the Insurrection Act to avoid its use as a justification for deploying military cyber capabilities against U.S. citizens, Nick discusses the dangers of computer generated swatting services, Brian highlights the recent Supreme Court argument that may settle whether online stalking is a “true threat” v. protected First Amendment activity, and, last but not least, Nick checks in on Elon Musk’s… [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 8:55 am
., Davison v. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 6:00 am
Citing Matter of Brown v Velez, 153 AD3d 517, the Appellate Division observed that at an administrative expungement hearing to determine whether a report of child abuse or maltreatment is substantiated, the allegations in the report must be established "by a preponderance of the evidence"*. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 6:00 am
Citing Matter of Brown v Velez, 153 AD3d 517, the Appellate Division observed that at an administrative expungement hearing to determine whether a report of child abuse or maltreatment is substantiated, the allegations in the report must be established "by a preponderance of the evidence"*. [read post]
23 Apr 2023, 6:36 pm
Concerning private pacts, Biskupic does a flashback to NFIB v. [read post]
23 Apr 2023, 7:36 am
[V]irality may no longer be the goal. [read post]
22 Apr 2023, 7:37 pm
In Misjuns v. [read post]
22 Apr 2023, 7:16 pm
Pix Credit hereThe great project of convergence has been ingloriously drifting toward the trash bin of history de facto even as its once progressive now reactionary claque continues to hold high its de jure banner. [read post]
22 Apr 2023, 8:28 am
The majority agrees that this is true. [read post]
22 Apr 2023, 5:08 am
Barr v. [read post]
22 Apr 2023, 3:32 am
Here is the opinion: Danco Laboratories v. [read post]
21 Apr 2023, 7:12 pm
Barr v. [read post]
21 Apr 2023, 3:46 pm
It'd be one thing if the jury found the personal use enhancement not true. [read post]
21 Apr 2023, 10:49 am
In Pragnell v. [read post]
