Search for: "US v. Banks" Results 2261 - 2280 of 14,524
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Oct 2020, 6:14 am by Lindsay C. Demaree
Greenough, 105 U.S. 527 (1882) and Central Railroad & Banking Co. v. [read post]
30 Sep 2020, 9:05 pm by Herbert Hovenkamp
Philadelphia National Bank, the Court held that, although banking regulators had the power to approve bank mergers, they did not evaluate competitive effects as antitrust law did. [read post]
30 Sep 2020, 2:41 am
[Yes] TTABlog Test: Is HERITAGE SOUTHEAST BANK Confusable With SOUTHEAST BANK (Stylized), for Banking Services? [read post]
29 Sep 2020, 11:34 am by Sam Brunson
The Supreme Court has held that “willful” means “a voluntary, intentional violation of a known legal duty” (US v. [read post]
29 Sep 2020, 2:29 am by Molly Adams
The 2015 case of MAP v MFP [2015] EWHC 627 (Fam) highlights this reluctance. [read post]
28 Sep 2020, 1:51 am by Peter Mahler
Mace v Tunick The analysis got more complicated in the wake of the Appellate Division, Second Department’s 2017 decision in the Mace v Tunick case that I wrote about here and here. [read post]
24 Sep 2020, 8:29 am by Eugene Volokh
Perhaps because of this, courts have generally struck down bans on the publication of government officials' home addresses, see Publius v. [read post]
23 Sep 2020, 8:55 pm by Simon Lovegrove (UK)
The draft RTS also defines certain terms used in relation to material risk taker identification in the CRD IV and in the PRA Rulebook following the transposition of CRD V. [read post]
23 Sep 2020, 1:55 am by Kevin Kaufman
The tax is primarily levied on fossil fuels used for heating purposes and motor fuels. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 1:25 pm
Used as human shields in order to facilitate the robbers’ escape from the bank, the hostages were forced into a Ford Explorer belonging to one of the hostages, Kelly Huber. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 1:16 pm by Candice Grieve
The Supreme Court of Appeal (SCA) in Investec Bank Limited v Erf 436 Elandspoort (Pty) Ltd and Others gave useful examples of what constitutes a tacit acknowledgement of liability (which interrupts the running of prescription of a debt in terms of section 14 of the Prescription Act 1969). [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 1:08 pm by Giles Peaker
Hussain v Vaswami & Ors (2020) EWCA Civ 1216 (not on Bailii yet. [read post]