Search for: "US v. Miller" Results 2261 - 2280 of 4,240
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Apr 2015, 4:11 pm by Stephen Bilkis
"); 554 US at 625 ("We therefore read [United States v] Miller [, 307 US 174 (1939),] to say only that the Second Amendment does not protect those weapon not typically possessed by law-abiding citizens for lawful purposes, such as short-barreled shotguns. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 2:27 pm by Bill Araiza
  (It's true enough that Justice Scalia doesn't concede that there were in fact "hundreds of judges" who read Miller as adopting the militia-use understanding, so maybe the Court would have an out to not resurrect Miller if they ever adopted this theory.) [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 12:27 pm by Shea Denning
Miller as pinging simply is not part and parcel of the provision of cellular phone service”). [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 3:45 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
""However, a law firm's "failure to comply with the rules on retainer agreements (22 NYCRR 1215.1) does not preclude it from suing to recover legal fees for the services it provided" (Miller v Nadler, 60 AD3d 499, 500 [Sup Ct New York County 2009], citing Egnotovich v Katten Muchin Zavis & Roseman LLP, 55 AD3d 462, 464 [1st Dept 2008]; Nicoll & Davis LLP v Ainetchi, 52 AD3d 412 [1st Dept 2008]; Seth Rubenstein, P.C. v… [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 4:36 am by Edith Roberts
For The New York Times, Adam Liptak reports that one of the grants, in Janus v. [read post]
30 Jan 2007, 7:13 am
Miller's comments also included a review of the 2006 Saltzburg and Chemerinsky memorandums plus an update on two class actions lawsuits, Macomber v. [read post]
15 Jun 2007, 12:30 pm
Another fine and fair summer weekend is upon us. [read post]
2 May 2021, 4:46 pm by INFORRM
It increases the fine for insult from one million drams (1,800 US dollars) to three million drams (5,600 dollars) and for insult from two million drams (3,700 dollars to six million drams (11,200 dollars). [read post]