Search for: "United States v. Breyer" Results 2261 - 2280 of 3,533
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jun 2012, 9:30 am
§§636(b)(1)(A)–(B); United States v. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 1:36 am by Kevin LaCroix
  Amgen then filed a petition to the United States Supreme Court for a writ of certiorari. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 6:37 am by Conor McEvily
Hopwood notes that Paul Clement’s use of the phrase “unprecedented and unbounded” in his brief for the ACA challengers echoes a phrase used by the Chief Justice in the Court’s opinion in United Haulers Association, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 9:51 am by Tonya Gisselberg
Downing, the Deputy Chief for Computer Crime at the Computer Crime and Intellectual Property Section at the United State Department of Justice, was the second speaker on the panel. [read post]
29 May 2012, 2:48 pm by J. Gordon Hylton
Having granted cert., the United States Supreme Court affirmed the decision of the Arkansas Supreme Court. [read post]
27 May 2012, 10:31 pm by Leland E. Beck
The Supreme Court of the United States unanimously took Congress at its word last week. [read post]
27 May 2012, 7:42 am by Jeff Gamso
"This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.And it's been settled (although sometimes unsettling) since Marbury v. [read post]
25 May 2012, 1:35 pm by Jeff Gamso
United States, and looking back 160 years to Justice Story's one paragraph opinion for a unanimous court in United States v. [read post]
25 May 2012, 12:52 pm by Lyle Denniston
  Among other arguments, they urged the Court not to consider developments in campaign finance since the Court’s 2010 ruling that is centrally at issue: Citizens United v. [read post]
25 May 2012, 1:30 am by seo
Constitution states in part that the "right of the people to be secure in their persons . . . against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated….' Last month's decision by the United States Supreme Court in the case of Florence v. [read post]
25 May 2012, 1:30 am by seo
Constitution states in part that the "right of the people to be secure in their persons . . . against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated….' Last month's decision by the United States Supreme Court in the case of Florence v. [read post]