Search for: "United States v. Cores" Results 2261 - 2280 of 3,430
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Dec 2016, 6:57 am by Juan C. Antúnez
 As noted by Judge Warner’s strong dissent in the linked-to case above: The right to marry is a fundamental right, protected by the United States Constitution. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 3:10 am
On the subject of ethics, there's good news for practitioners of espionage -- if they happen to be in the United States, that is. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 7:08 am by Marty Lederman
 * * * *The Supreme Court explained, in the second of its ACA cases (King v. [read post]
13 Jan 2025, 5:57 am by David Cole
The Court should also reaffirm, as it stated as recently as last year’s decision in Moody v. [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 5:32 am
The procedure was used in the case of United States v. [read post]
31 May 2019, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
  Apart from his ACA decisions, in his dissent in Obergefell v. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 4:25 pm by admin
And when people take up arms against the United States and [are] captured within the United States, why should we not be able to use our military and intelligence community to question that person as to what they know about enemy activity? [read post]
17 Jan 2021, 4:11 pm by INFORRM
United States The Supreme Court of the State of New York’s Second Department has overturned a decades-old precedent when it ruled that a false claim of homosexuality is no longer defamation per se. [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 8:52 pm
The mechanics of that management then folds back onto the techniques of governance asserted by all governance actors working individually but whose actions are aligned by their fidelity to the core p [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:35 am by centerforartlaw
”[11] In 1813, the American vessel, Marquis de Somerueles, was carrying cargo from the Italian Academy of Arts when it was captured by the British.[12] The United States successfully petitioned the Admiralty Court of Halifax to have the cargo be returned to the United States.[13] The Court held that the arts and sciences are entitled to protection as “an exception to the severe rights of warfare. [read post]