Search for: "United States v. District Court" Results 2261 - 2280 of 34,586
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Oct 2009, 3:54 pm by Sheppard Mullin
Specifically, relying on the standards established by the United States Supreme Court in Bell Atlantic v. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 9:19 am by Stephen D. Rosenberg
Tussey v ABB, Inc., an excessive fee and revenue sharing case decided on the last day of March after a full trial before the United States District Court for the District of Western Missouri, is a remarkable decision, imposing extensive liability for acts involving the costs of and revenue sharing for a major plan, on the basis of extensive and detailed fact finding. [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 6:38 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
In other words, under more recent Supreme Court precedent, Garcia may no longer be good law.The intervening Supreme Court precedent on sovereign immunity and the ADA is United States v. [read post]
27 Jan 2018, 6:40 am by Gregory B. Williams
’s motion to transfer two patent infringement actions from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware to the United States District Court for the Central District of Delaware where Amgen has a declaratory judgment action pending. [read post]
12 Mar 2011, 9:09 am
The suit, filed in the United States District Court of the Northern District of California, specifically alleged that male employees were promoted faster and to higher positions than women. [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 7:44 pm
District Court for the Western District of Washington recently ruled in Ruiz-Diaz v. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 3:13 pm
A recent decision from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia highlights the importance of pleading specific facts in support of unfair business practices claims to survive a Motion to Dismiss. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 12:49 pm by Howard Wasserman
Judge James Beaty of the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina has denied, at least in part, the motions to dismiss in Evans v. [read post]