Search for: "United States v. Doe" Results 2261 - 2280 of 44,299
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Sep 2015, 11:39 am by Michelle Velasquez
While in my final semester of law school, the United States Supreme Court issued its decision in Padilla v. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 1:45 pm by WIMS
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. [read post]
29 May 2015, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
She stated that he does not respect their daughters’ privacy and will enter the bathroom when they are taking a shower. . . . [read post]
27 Dec 2016, 3:03 pm
.' This appeal presents the question of whether this restriction is race-based and violates the Fifteenth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States. [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 9:05 am by Thomas Dillickrath and Molly Lorenzi
On March 10, 2020, the United States District Court for the District of Arizona issued a tentative ruling denying Axon Enterprise’s motion for preliminary injunction and dismissing its complaint against the Federal Trade Commission, due to lack of subject matter jurisdiction. [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 7:13 am
United States, 529 U.S. 848, 859, 120 S. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 2:37 pm
The United States Supreme Court recently held that a foreign manufacturer that places a product into the stream of commerce in the United States does not automatically subject itself to jurisdiction in each of the states where the product might foreseeably end up. [read post]
8 May 2012, 8:47 am by The Federalist Society
Patchak the Court will consider whether, notwithstanding the Quiet Title Act, the Administrative Procedure Act waives sovereign immunity in a suit challenging the United States’ title to lands held in trust for an Indian tribe. [read post]
14 May 2024, 4:17 pm by INFORRM
The standards for libel differ whether you are in Canada or the United States, so should one or the other decide to sue for libel, it would make a difference where they filed the lawsuit. [read post]
20 Jul 2017, 10:00 pm
Post By Blog Staff Earlier this week, the Unites States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (“CAFC”) held that the United States District Court for the District of Delaware clearly erred in its obviousness analysis in Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. [read post]