Search for: "United States v. Holder"
Results 2261 - 2280
of 4,280
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Sep 2013, 2:21 pm
Perry and United States v. [read post]
10 Sep 2013, 6:51 am
United States decision impact immigration law? [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 9:30 am
Italian Colors Restaurant United States v. [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 6:45 am
See Davis v. [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 3:39 am
After receiving the stolen data, [she] re-sold the information to her co-conspirators in the United States. [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 3:18 am
As summer concludes and the federal bureaucracy returns to their Washington offices, the fall-out from SCOTUS' United States v Windsor decision continues. [read post]
8 Sep 2013, 6:01 pm
Why on earth “would it have looked bad” for the Solicitor General to be involved in the most important case the United States has argued in a decade, where the entire DOJ was coordinating a defense from day one? [read post]
8 Sep 2013, 8:28 am
United States v. [read post]
6 Sep 2013, 10:28 am
Under the Lanham Act, a federal law, the holder of a mark may ask the United States Patent and Trademark Office to register the mark on the principal register. [read post]
5 Sep 2013, 4:42 am
California and United States v. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 4:00 am
Most, if not all, states have theft laws that substantially track the Model Penal Code. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 10:55 am
” United States v. [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 11:37 am
Unauthorized Access to his former employer’s Computers In support of the “no unauthorized access” argument, Nosal argued that: (1) under the Ninth Circuit’s en banc decision in this case (United States v. [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 8:30 am
Corp. v. [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 6:49 am
As was explained by the United States 5th Circuit Court of Appeals, in 1998, in the case styled, St. [read post]
27 Aug 2013, 5:28 am
United States, in which the Court split 4-4 . [read post]
27 Aug 2013, 4:51 am
Holder, to use the occasion “as an opportunity to affirm our nation’s commitment to the promises of equality and voting rights as guaranteed by the words of the United States Constitution. [read post]
26 Aug 2013, 11:51 am
The Microsoft v. [read post]
26 Aug 2013, 8:52 am
The United States District Court for the Northern District of California denied Sequenom’s motion for a preliminary injunction to prevent Ariosa from making, using, or selling that test. [read post]
25 Aug 2013, 3:50 pm
United States v. [read post]
