Search for: "United States v. Morales"
Results 2261 - 2280
of 3,618
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Oct 2012, 9:55 am
United States and Alberts v. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 8:08 am
The Supreme Court rejected this argument, saying, “the mere fact that a copyright is property derived from a grant by the United States is insufficient to support the claim of exemption.” To be exempt from state taxation, the government must reserve some sort of controlling interest in a grant or privilege. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 8:08 am
” As support, it then stated, “In Fox Film Corp. v. [read post]
22 Oct 2012, 3:21 am
K 3258 S88 2012 Models of religious freedom : Switzerland, the United States, and Syria by analytical, methodological, and eclectic representation. [read post]
19 Oct 2012, 10:02 am
’” Summit Bank v. [read post]
15 Oct 2012, 9:17 am
A case titled Escobedo v. [read post]
13 Oct 2012, 9:23 pm
On the other hand, on behalf of the respondent, State of West Bengal, in opposition to that plea, reliance was placed on a later decision of this Court in Akbar Sheikh and others v. [read post]
11 Oct 2012, 11:24 am
Article I, Section 8, Clause 1 of the United States Constitution—the Taxing and Spending Clause—states that “…Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States…”. [read post]
8 Oct 2012, 9:53 am
United States v. [read post]
30 Sep 2012, 11:25 am
United States v. [read post]
25 Sep 2012, 11:26 am
In early August, the former judges and prosecutors signed onto an amicus brief that urges the Supreme Court to grant certiorari in United States v. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 11:32 pm
The United Kingdom is a multi-cultural society. [read post]
9 Sep 2012, 9:02 pm
State v. [read post]
9 Sep 2012, 1:46 pm
United States v. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 9:24 am
United States). [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 8:39 am
According to the statute, such an asset is one that is: “(A) held in the United States for a foreign securities intermediary doing business in the United States, (B) a blocked asset [defined as those involving Peterson v. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 7:59 pm
It’s a divider, not a uniter. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 10:39 am
(See also the celebrated United States v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 10:39 am
(See also the celebrated United States v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 7:09 am
It was for the legislature to change the law and the established practise of the USPTO (United States Patent and Trademark Office) if it wished to treat isolated DNA differently from other compositions of matter to account for its perceived special function. [read post]
