Search for: "United States v. Was" Results 2261 - 2280 of 102,804
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Apr 2024, 3:00 am by Jeff Welty
Pachtman, 424 U.S. 409 (1976), the Supreme Court of the United States considered prosecutorial immunity in the context of section 1983 actions. [read post]
30 Mar 2024, 9:53 am by Larry
United States in which the importer challenged the tariff classification of several versions of the gaseous tritium light sources ("GTLS"). [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 9:05 pm by Korinne Dunn
These states follow the logic of Marvin v. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 7:28 pm
In 2016 the United States Government published its first National Action Plan on Responsible Business Conduct. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 1:10 pm by Eugene Volokh
Misinformation has always been with us, but the endemicity of social media and the depth of political polarization in the United States and elsewhere has enabled falsehoods to be amplified, monetized, microtargeted, and spread around the world at unprecedented speed and scale. [read post]
Declaring the NLRB’s rationale to be “nonsense,” on March 26, 2024, a unanimous three-judge panel for the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia in Stern Produce Company Inc v. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 10:49 am by Holly
The law made its way to the courts in a dispute as to whether British limitation law or United States law would apply to the claims. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 8:22 am by admin
United States, 293 F. 1013, 1014 (D.C. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 6:05 am by Blake Van Santen
” Note: Readers may be interested in our South Africa v. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 5:55 am by Vito Todeschini
The ILC’s interpretation of the prosecute or extradite principle aligns with the reasoning of the International Court of Justice (ICJ) in the 2012 Belgium v. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 5:45 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Thus, the declarations were not subject to the general rule of grand jury secrecy because they were not “evidence actually presented to [the grand jury]” nor “anything that may tend to reveal what transpired before it” (see United States v Eastern Air Lines, Inc., 923 F2d 241, 244 [2d Cir 1991], citing Fed Rules Crim Pro rule 6 [e] [2]). [read post]