Search for: "AT&T"
Results 2281 - 2300
of 881,669
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Dec 2011, 5:01 pm
Once this has been proven, it is possible to take into account evidence that has been published at a later stage in order to support these conclusions (see T 609/02 [9]).[3] In the present case, the patent does not provide any experimental data establishing that a plasmid expressing the G gene can induce a protective response against rabies in canidae.[4] However, the OD has pointed out, in substance, that at the date under consideration there was no use of polynucleotide vaccines for… [read post]
16 May 2011, 3:01 pm
In accordance with decision T 748/91 relative dimensions in drawings and size ratios can be inferred from a schematic drawing such as figure 6 of D2. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 3:01 pm
However, it has been established in the case law of the boards that “the content of the application as filed” as referred to in A 123(2) does not include any priority documents (see e.g. decision T 260/85). [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 3:02 pm
As has been observed elsewhere (see T 87/05), the RPBA are in part at least a codification of the case-law on procedural practice. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 1:10 am
This pencil cracked under the pressureThe main claim in this opposition appeal concerns an E. coli host cell sample subjected to non-lysing pressure. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 5:01 pm
It follows thus that if such a request is submitted in appeal the board has to exercise its discretion under Article 12(4) RPBA and decide whether to admit or not such a request (see the discussion on this topic in T 28/10 [3.2-3], in which also the previous case law of the boards of appeal is discussed). [2.4] The present main request differs from the proprietor’s main request at first instance (which is identical to the 1st auxiliary request on appeal) essentially by the absence of… [read post]
8 Aug 2007, 3:15 pm
Marcum, 60 M.J. 198 (C.A.A.F. 2004), to limit the Don't Ask, Don't Tell policy. [read post]
5 Feb 2010, 7:22 am
The New York Times published an editorial advocating the repeal of "don't ask, don't tell. [read post]
21 Sep 2022, 12:22 am
Following Rules 71(1) and 132(2) EPC, any period for reply by the applicant must not be shorter than 2 months (see also T 246/08, point 4 of the reasons). [read post]
11 Jul 2010, 3:01 pm
T 790/92 [4.6]; T 953/94 [3.1]; T 1161/04 [4.5]; T 1567/05 [3.7]; T 756/06 [13]). [read post]
26 Jan 2021, 11:45 pm
T 205/14, points 3.3 and 3.6). [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 4:07 pm
I should add that the translation of the headline of T 967/97 provided in T 1514/05 is poor. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 4:07 pm
I should add that the translation of the headline of T 967/97 provided in T 1514/05 is poor. [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 3:08 pm
Nelson (Villanova Law School) has posted 'Don't Ask, Don't Tell' Corporate Crime on SSRN. [read post]
18 Nov 2006, 4:10 am
"Meehan targeting 'don't ask, don't tell'": The Boston Globe today contains an article that begins, "Two leading House Democrats said yesterday that they intend to reverse the 13-year-old 'don't ask, don't tell' policy on gays and lesbians in the military when Congress comes under Democratic control in January. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 2:28 pm
The judge had previously ruled that the military's "don't ask, don't tell" policy regulating homosexuality is... [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 6:45 pm
Judge overturns ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’ ban on gays as unconstitutional | Richard Adams | World news | guardian.co.uk California judge declares ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’ policy banning gays from serving in the US military to be unconstitutional. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 9:05 am
The Congressional Research Service issued a 16-page report in September analyzing the constitutional challenges to Don't Ask, Don't Tell. [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 6:37 am
And The New York Times reports today that "Military to Revise 'Don't Ask, Don't Tell' Rules. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 9:40 pm
"'Don't Ask, Don't Tell' on trial": The Press-Enterprise of Riverside, California has this news update. [read post]
