Search for: "Anderson v. State" Results 2281 - 2300 of 2,813
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Apr 2015, 7:24 am by Joy Waltemath
The entire panel agreed, however, that summary judgment was properly granted on her public policy wrongful discharge claim since she failed to show that a state regulation setting forth baseline recordkeeping requirements for pharmacies mirrored the state whistleblower law or that she ever reported a violation (Hale v. [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 7:01 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: US CAFC affirms that patent ownership (and standing) can vest through operation of law: Sky Technologies v SAP AG (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Patently-O) (Property, intangible) US CAFC grants en banc request to challenge written description requirement: Ariad v Lilly (Patently-O) (Filewrapper) (Washington… [read post]
23 Dec 2008, 2:57 pm
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, December 17, 2008 US v. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 1:13 am by Angus McCullough QC
As David Anderson QC has remarked, we are in the territory of second best solutions. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 10:25 am by Antonin I. Pribetic
In 1964 the US Supreme Court as New York Times Co v Sullivan (1964) 376 U.S. 254 recognised that the First Amendment applied to state laws on defamation. [read post]
4 Mar 2012, 5:24 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
[Also guest stars Morena Baccarin (who has also played Erica Flynn on "The Mentalist," Jessica Brody on "Homeland" and Anna in "V").] [read post]
10 Feb 2013, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Journalism and regulation There are no new PCC adjudications to report, but several resolved complaints including: Alexander Anderson v Press & Journal (Aberdeen), 8/02/2013; Dr Mark Bailey v Irish News, Clause 1, 07/02/2013; A man & a woman v Sunday World, Clauses 1, 3, 5, 07/02/2013; Hertfordshire Constabulary v Hertfordshire Mercury, Clause 1, 07/02/2013; A woman v The Daily Telegraph, Clause 3, 07/02/2013, A woman v The Mail… [read post]