Search for: "Attorney General v. Superior Court"
Results 2281 - 2300
of 3,267
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Nov 2011, 11:18 am
Consider the brief like a motion in court, there is a page limit. [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 8:01 am
The case is Commonwealth v. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 6:12 pm
V. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 7:19 pm
" The prior Superior Court decision in which this defense was first found to be invalid was the Superior Court case of Pringle v. [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 8:51 am
Superior Court (Sup. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 12:55 pm
Martin v. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 12:41 pm
In Greg Barnett v. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 12:41 pm
In Greg Barnett v. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 6:00 am
[Nicholas Laboratories, LLC v. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 7:39 pm
Another site worth a spot in your RSS feed is Virginia attorney Christopher Hill’s Construction Law Musings, which deals with construction issues generally but which frequently includes posts on ADR. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 7:39 pm
Another site worth a spot in your RSS feed is Virginia attorney Christopher Hill’s Construction Law Musings, which deals with construction issues generally but which frequently includes posts on ADR. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 11:27 am
Superior Court oral argument broadcast live from the California Supreme Court on television. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 10:41 am
" Warren v. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 9:00 am
Superior Court(1984) 161 CA 3d 151 (pdf) Officers, Shareholders and Managers General Environmental Science Corp v. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 9:00 am
Superior Court(1984) 161 CA 3d 151 (pdf) Officers, Shareholders and Managers General Environmental Science Corp v. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 4:42 pm
In a pithy opinion (typical of Presiding Justice Gilbert), the Second District Court of Appeal reversed a trial court’s order partially denying successful CEQA petitioners’ motion for attorneys’ fees under Code of Civil Procedure section 1021.5, the private attorney general statute. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 12:21 pm
Solicitor General Donald B. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 5:49 pm
At Scotusblog, Timothy Coates concluded the following: “The Court’s questions indicate that this case may turn less on the niceties of the common law than the realities of common practice in the criminal courts. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 1:42 am
Well, if I remember correctly, there was a whole gaggle of talking heads acting kind of superior and questioning why the group was protesting and what their goals were? [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 11:53 am
Most cases are, by default, in the Superior Court. [read post]
