Search for: "Bear v. State"
Results 2281 - 2300
of 14,844
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Sep 2008, 12:58 pm
Likewise, the right of parents to control the education and upbringing of their children is fundamental under Pierce v Society of Sisters and Meyer v Nebraska, yet states have enormous latitude in requiring parents to send their kids to school, vaccinate their kids, and so forth. [read post]
19 Feb 2021, 1:46 am
The Court stated that the focus of the appeal is the crossing rules, but it is important to read them in context. [read post]
6 Feb 2022, 1:30 pm
’’ Despite the choice of law provision, George Frank unilaterally added the following language at the end of paragraph 19: ‘‘Since this is a contract for an agreement taking place in the state of Connecticut, Connecticut laws will supersede those of California. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 10:37 am
Lumpkin On May 31, 2016, the US Supreme Court ruled in United States Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 11:20 am
It was not controlled by state law. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 4:56 am
Since one legal tests of trademark infringement is customer confusion, you be the judge: Are the marks confusing enough that customers might think products bearing them are from the same source? [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 11:14 pm
in 2009 in the case,of United States v. [read post]
26 Nov 2010, 7:00 am
” On Monday, in Walker v. [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 8:15 am
(Bush v. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 1:26 pm
” As such, the insurance carrier is the party bearing the burden of proof on whether the injured worker can legally work in the United States. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 6:00 am
The Appellate Division initially observed that an applicant for disability retirement benefits bears the burden of establishing that his disability arose from an accident within the meaning of the Retirement and Social Security Law [RSSL], and the Comptroller's determination in this regard will be upheld if supported by substantial evidence. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 3:42 pm
In Printz v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 6:00 am
The Appellate Division initially observed that an applicant for disability retirement benefits bears the burden of establishing that his disability arose from an accident within the meaning of the Retirement and Social Security Law [RSSL], and the Comptroller's determination in this regard will be upheld if supported by substantial evidence. [read post]
9 May 2014, 5:32 pm
” Lamberti v. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 4:00 am
"* See Matter of McCambridge v McGuire, 62 NY2d 563. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 4:00 am
"* See Matter of McCambridge v McGuire, 62 NY2d 563. [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 3:46 pm
The United States Supreme Court voted 5-4 to uphold the appellate court decision in Florida v. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 8:47 am
MP, R(on the application of) v the Secretary of State for Justice [2012] EWHC 214 (Admin) – read judgment The prison authorities had acted unlawfully in restricting childcare resettlement leave to prisoners who were within two years of their release date and had been allocated to “open” conditions. [read post]
12 Jul 2013, 7:04 am
The case is U.S. v. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 9:36 am
At issue in United States v. [read post]
