Search for: "Burns v. State" Results 2281 - 2300 of 3,000
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Sep 2011, 11:46 pm by Lara
Related Posts: Burning Man’s Burning Marks Trademark Attorney Ponders Parody — Yankees v Evil Enterprises Frustrated Trademark Attorney Examines Frustrated Marks Geekview IP Week in Review Disney Withdraws its Trademark Registration Applications for SEAL TEAM 6 [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 6:25 am by Mandelman
In 1954, the Supreme Court handed down its decision in Brown v. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 3:27 pm by Jon Sands
  The United States Attorney did not want the death penalty. [read post]
22 Dec 2011, 11:59 am by Bexis
  All this in a state – Illinois – where the highest court forbids FDCA-based common-law causes of action (see Martin v. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
The review examines the overall state of the domestic news market, its financial sustainability, the role of digital advertising and social media. [read post]
13 Nov 2021, 6:48 am by Michael C. Dorf
Relying on the votes of five Justices in the Supreme Court's 2012 decision in the first Affordable Care Act case, NFIB v. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 2:30 am by INFORRM
. “This article is inaccurate and misrepresents the facts” the corporation stated, as reported by Tabloid Watch here. [read post]
8 Dec 2007, 7:17 am
The Ohio Cerebral Palsy Resource Guide contains resources within the State of Ohio. [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 6:10 am by Joel R. Brandes
Such written agreement must state that it will be the responsibility of the adoptive parent(s) to inform the appropriate State or local official when they are no longer legally responsible for the child or no longer providing any support to the child” (18 NYCRR 421.24[c][5]). [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 2:46 am by Kelly
XX v HMRC (IP finance) United States US Patents  ‘Sub-standard’ patents cost the US economy over $25 billion a year. [read post]
23 Oct 2016, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
The News and Observer, a newspaper from Raleigh, North Carolina, is to pay $7.5 million in damages for defaming a state government employee in 2010. [read post]