Search for: "CF-3"
Results 2281 - 2300
of 2,385
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jan 2008, 10:47 am
Cf. [read post]
17 Jan 2008, 7:38 pm
Cf. id. at 184 (listing cases reaching different result.) [read post]
17 Jan 2008, 7:55 am
The other day we got a tip that the FDA had just posted something on its website that we'd want to read. [read post]
13 Jan 2008, 5:06 am
UPDATE: Reader Dave Walter emails: You can take the credit for most of the illumination in my home and your blog posts on cf bulbs are always illuminating, but the NY Times article you link to in 'LUKEWARM ON compact fluorescent bulbs' says less about the bulbs and more about the NYT (insular, complacent, reactionary, elitist, lacking balance - although they do briefly discuss "distaste for change" 3/4ths of the way through) Reminds me of all the complaints… [read post]
7 Jan 2008, 11:31 am
Cf. 2 Peter Lareau, Nat'l Labor Relns. [read post]
7 Jan 2008, 11:27 am
Cf. [read post]
17 Dec 2007, 8:18 am
§ 301(b)(3) (emphasis added); see Blab T.V. of Mobile, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Dec 2007, 10:16 am
Corp., 265 AD2d at 457, 458; cf. [read post]
13 Dec 2007, 6:12 am
"Anders aber, wenn der Richter auf die Angriffe mit einer Strafanzeige reagiert:"En revanche, la situation se présente différemment lorsque, comme en l'espèce, le magistrat atteint dans sa personnalité réagit en déposant une plainte pénale (cf. art. 173 CP), assortie de conclusions civiles en… [read post]
11 Dec 2007, 3:18 am
Cf. [read post]
10 Dec 2007, 1:08 pm
Cf. [read post]
9 Dec 2007, 12:02 pm
3. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 4:52 pm
Page 3} Plaintiff's companions Williams and D'Honau complained at the scene about his treatment, and a police sergeant, defendant Carole Baldwin, arrived to speak to them. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 4:59 am
Cf. slip op. at 15-16 n.2. [read post]
4 Dec 2007, 4:01 am
Cf. id. [read post]
3 Dec 2007, 3:00 am
And: "Thou who sawest the mote in thy brother's eye, hast not seen the beam in thine own" (Mt 7:3). [read post]
29 Nov 2007, 7:45 am
Kent br. at 1-3. [read post]
19 Nov 2007, 1:14 pm
On the one hand, patentees are free to impose restrictions, such as field-of-use restrictions, when they license others to manufacture their patented products.[2] Such restrictions can be permissible even if they would be antitrust violations outside the patent context.[3] On the other hand, a patentee cannot restrict the use of its patented products once they are sold, whether the sale is by the patentee itself or by a licensee.[4] This is the exhaustion, or first-sale, doctrine. [read post]
19 Nov 2007, 5:45 am
This Claim is Procedurally Barred. 1 The order of the Circuit Court is attached hereto. 3 Florida law is settled that claims that have previously been raised in a postconviction relief motion, or that could have been but were not raised in a prior postconviction relief motion, are subject to a procedural bar to further litigation of those claims. [read post]
19 Nov 2007, 5:45 am
This Claim is Procedurally Barred. 1 The order of the Circuit Court is attached hereto. 3 Florida law is settled that claims that have previously been raised in a postconviction relief motion, or that could have been but were not raised in a prior postconviction relief motion, are subject to a procedural bar to further litigation of those claims. [read post]
