Search for: "Doe v. Doe"
Results 2281 - 2300
of 136,998
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
Randolph does not give a potential defendant veto power over a search where he has to be asked first
7 Jul 2008, 1:43 pm
United States v. [read post]
15 Feb 2007, 9:25 pm
Per Scott v. [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 6:00 am
DOE thereupon appealed the Supreme Court's ruling.Citing Matter of Dempsey v New York City Department of Education, 25 NY3d 291, the Appellate Division unanimously reversed the Supreme Court's decision "on the law" and dismissed Petitioner's Article 78 action.The court explained that the denial of Petitioner's application for security clearance for a position as a public school cleaner has a rational basis in the record and was not arbitrary and… [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 6:00 am
DOE thereupon appealed the Supreme Court's ruling.Citing Matter of Dempsey v New York City Department of Education, 25 NY3d 291, the Appellate Division unanimously reversed the Supreme Court's decision "on the law" and dismissed Petitioner's Article 78 action.The court explained that the denial of Petitioner's application for security clearance for a position as a public school cleaner has a rational basis in the record and was not arbitrary and… [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 7:38 am
Consider last Term’s decision in Shelby County v. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 6:11 am
The Chief writes: A system claim generally covers what the system is, not what the system does. [read post]
9 May 2011, 8:10 am
Co. v. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 4:00 pm
(See Gattuso v. [read post]
24 Sep 2009, 5:00 am
In Merritt v. [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 10:57 am
Enterprises Ltd v. [read post]
25 Mar 2013, 11:52 am
See Perez v. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 2:26 am
(March 2023)UK divergence from the EPO on plausibility (Sandoz v BMS), Part 1: Is the "plausibility" test the same for both sufficiency and inventive step? [read post]
4 Dec 2008, 10:14 pm
§ 2(b)(2) does not extend [...] [read post]
8 Jun 2018, 1:06 pm
” As she did not advance a substantive argument on this issue, the Court of Appeals does not address it pursuant to its holding in Milby v. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 9:28 am
In Lozman v. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 1:06 pm
It does not appear that... [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 12:35 pm
Ryburn v. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 8:26 am
Although Daimler is an ATS case, the Court does... [read post]
30 Oct 2009, 5:00 am
In Laster v. [read post]
28 Oct 2016, 12:23 pm
As we previously discussed, while the constitutional issues are not in the foreground, it does... [read post]
