Search for: "Does 1 - 47"
Results 2281 - 2300
of 4,452
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Oct 2015, 4:15 pm
§ 2710(c)(1); 47 U.S.C. [read post]
10 Oct 2015, 9:37 am
LEXIS 694, *1 (Ga. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 7:22 pm
Id. at 47-48. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 4:08 pm
He focused on its compliance with primary and secondary EU law, namely Articles 7, 8, 47 and 52 (1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (CFREU) and Directive 95/46/EC on data protection in the EU. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 5:00 am
§895.047(1)(e); Ford Motor Co. v. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 6:36 am
For example: A study of college students with access to a car found that 1 in 6 (about 17 percent) had driven under the influence of a drug other than alcohol at least once in the past year. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 3:28 am
Does 1–47, 2012 WL 4005842, at *1 (U.S. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 1:33 am
The High Court then referred the question to the CJEU: ‘(1) Whether in the course of determining a complaint which has been made to an independent office holder who has been vested by statute with the functions of administering and enforcing data protection legislation that personal data is being transferred to another third country (in this case, the United States of America) the laws and practices of which, it is claimed, do not contain adequate… [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 8:14 am
(The renewal term was extended to 47 years in 1976, and to 67 years in 1998.) [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 6:00 am
Over the last decade, the gender pay gap has slightly narrowed for organizations with budgets of $1 million or less or $50 million or more, but has actually widened for organizations with budgets between $1 million and $50 million. [read post]
4 Oct 2015, 7:25 am
There is no similar exclusion with respect to the trust provisions of the Act (see s. 3(1)). [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 11:51 am
Schrems thus appealed to the Irish High Court, which in turn referred the case to the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) (¶47). [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 2:59 am
Defendant’s statement also does not fail for lack of immediacy. [read post]
29 Sep 2015, 7:09 am
§1369(b)(1). [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 6:00 am
Wiretap Act (also known as Title III) prohibits the interception of a live communication (e.g., a telephone call) only if the interception occurs in the United States; it does not prohibit or regulate wiretaps (interception) conducted abroad.[8] Similarly, the U.S. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 3:15 am
On appeal, Carroll argued that the company’s proofs were insufficient because the dissociation statute does not permit member expulsion based upon “speculative” future disagreements or disputes between members. [read post]
25 Sep 2015, 7:37 am
Section 47 requires corporate license holders to notify the registrar within 30 days of significant changes in its shareholdings. [read post]
25 Sep 2015, 7:37 am
Section 47 requires corporate license holders to notify the registrar within 30 days of significant changes in its shareholdings. [read post]
25 Sep 2015, 2:50 am
Thomas, 47 Misc.3d 473 [Ithaca City Ct. 2014]. [read post]
24 Sep 2015, 11:41 am
But does that matter -- in this case? [read post]
