Search for: "ENGLISH v. STATE"
Results 2281 - 2300
of 7,358
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
Community Assn. v New York State Urban Dev. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
Community Assn. v New York State Urban Dev. [read post]
20 Jan 2019, 11:43 pm
See United States v. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 6:59 am
Following Advocate General Sharpston’s opinion, the Court stated that the InfoSoc Directive, which confers a more generous protection to TPMs than the Software Directive, should govern TPMs used in videogames. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 3:59 pm
There is no reason why the English court could not do the same. [read post]
17 Mar 2021, 11:45 am
Bus. v. [read post]
14 Jul 2019, 12:54 pm
In Case C-722/17 Reitbauer (decided last Wednesday but still not available in English), the Court confirmed its decision in Feniks, according to which such an action falls under Art 7(1) Brussels Ia if it is based on a contractual right. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 10:48 am
On one hand, United States Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 11:14 am
Black had served as Chief Justice of the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, and while there he had issued a fascinating decision called Sharpless v. [read post]
12 May 2012, 4:11 am
(2) If the court should have examined whether to refuse enforcement under Section 48(1)(a) for the reasons stated, has the Delhi High Court impliedly followed the Supreme Court in reading public policy in a wider manner (See, Phulchand Exports Ltd. v. [read post]
8 May 2009, 5:41 am
However, in Alexander v. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 6:19 am
The parents wanted to immerse their oldest two sons in English, and decided to come to the United States for an extended stay. [read post]
2 Dec 2009, 8:22 pm
In Romania, the “u” at the end of the name is the same as “son” in English. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 2:00 am
For more about the People v. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 10:41 am
In a 1993 decision called R. v. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 3:35 am
United States. [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 2:17 pm
Today, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit heard arguments in ClearCorrect v. [read post]
30 Jan 2014, 2:00 am
Evidence must always be sufficiently clear, convincing and cogent to satisfy the “balance of probabilities” test stated by the Supreme Court of Canada in F.H. v. [read post]
16 Feb 2022, 4:00 am
Feltz Design Build Ltd. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 10:22 am
Writing client-facing material using English as a second language? [read post]