Search for: "GORDON v GORDON" Results 2281 - 2300 of 2,592
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Dec 2008, 6:08 am
HOOVER (1858)THE RAPE OF MARINE SERGEANT LAWRENCE GORDON HUTCHINS, IIIThe American Military Legacy of AttainderCopyright © 2008 The JAG HUNTER [read post]
21 Dec 2008, 8:14 pm
If the court declares that you are incapable of managing yourself or your affairs, the court must then appoint the person you have nominated unless "there is good and sufficient reason for refusing the appointment.Fraser v. [read post]
16 Dec 2008, 9:00 am
  Judge Lasnik granted the defense motion - essentially putting a hold on the case until we hear from the Ninth Circuit in Gordon: Haselton v. [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 6:32 pm
I wonder if the Supreme Court's most recent preemption decision will have any bearing on the Ninth Circuit's preemption analysis in Gordon v. [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 11:22 am
Gordon which addressed the enforceability of a pre-statute prenuptial agreement. [read post]
10 Dec 2008, 1:46 pm
A few years later, while Fred was living in New York and practicing at Cahill Gordon & Reindel, his wife delivered a boy. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 6:23 am
Nelson, 33 FLW 2687, 4th DCA, Original Opinion at 33 FLW 2088, prohibition-speedy trial-motion for continuance filed after the speedy trial period expired but before any notice of expiration invoked the right of recapture was a nullity and has no effect-Question certified: Does a motion for continuance made after the expiration of the speedy trial period but before a def files a notice of expiration under the rule, which activates the right of recapture period, waive a def's speedy trial rights… [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 8:56 pm
Rev. 659Part of the text might be viewed in light of how OMB handled its analysis of the now-enjoined continuation rules:Similarly, Professor Robert Gordon of Stanford University points out how the "law and economics" movement is very practical. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 1:36 pm
’ paper by Graeme Clark SC (IP Down Under) Full Federal Court decision concerning brand reputation in context of ‘lookalike’ products and famous brands: Hansen Beverage Company v Bickfords (Australia) Pty Ltd (Mallesons Stephen Jaques) Federal Court holds that grace period applicable to a ‘parent patent’ is different to that of its divisional ‘child’: Mont Adventure Equipment v Phoenix Leisure Group (IP Down… [read post]