Search for: "Grant v. Superior Court"
Results 2281 - 2300
of 6,581
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jan 2017, 11:04 am
The court of appeals held last month in State v. [read post]
4 Jan 2017, 8:46 am
Facebook (California Superior Court). [read post]
4 Jan 2017, 8:01 am
The court also referenced the Seventh Circuit’s July 2016 decision in Hively v. [read post]
3 Jan 2017, 5:48 am
Citing Crow v. [read post]
2 Jan 2017, 4:28 pm
Bemish, the Indiana Court of Appeals held that a trial court erred in granting summary judgment to a business defendant that argued it was not liable for the negligent acts of its employee. [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 6:00 am
Superior Court (Pima County), 103 Ariz. 240, 439 P2d 811 (1968). [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 6:00 am
Superior Court (Pima County), 103 Ariz. 240, 439 P2d 811 (1968). [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 6:00 am
Superior Court (Pima County), 103 Ariz. 240, 439 P2d 811 (1968). [read post]
29 Dec 2016, 5:04 pm
The appellate court can summarily deny a Writ application, for reasons ranging from jurisdictional and procedural mistakes to 'we just aren't interested,' to 'you have other options to pursue your appellate review that are adequate to your situation.' It can also accept the case, at least initially, and so require the respondent (i.e., the Superior Court), or in effect require the other party, on the court's behalf, to… [read post]
29 Dec 2016, 5:22 am
” The high court explained in Brinker Restaurant Corp v. [read post]
29 Dec 2016, 5:00 am
In its recent decision in the case of Valentino v. [read post]
28 Dec 2016, 2:16 pm
” The strong Pennsylvania public policy in favor of granting comity to another state’s laws so long as they do not contradict those of the Commonwealth was also cited by the Superior Court. [read post]
28 Dec 2016, 9:29 am
The trial court granted summary judgment to the defendant employer on the vicarious liability issue, and the plaintiff appealed. [read post]
27 Dec 2016, 6:41 am
Noting the lack of evidence of any link between the employee’s disability and the board’s conduct, and finding she received all back wages and other reemployment benefits, the court granted summary judgment for the board. [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 1:35 pm
Id.The Supreme Court in Pascale v. [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 12:42 pm
; Starr v. [read post]
24 Dec 2016, 6:47 pm
Before the Court entered a formal order granting Wackenhut’s motion to decertify, the California Supreme Court issued Brinker Restaurant Corp. v. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 12:23 pm
Superior Court (2012) 53 Cal.4th 1004, 1038-1039 (Brinker).)Slip op., at 1. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 12:08 pm
" The case is Hanesbrands Inc. v. [read post]
18 Dec 2016, 6:53 pm
He drew on paras 101-103, 106 of Grant v. [read post]
