Search for: "In Matter of Johnson*" Results 2281 - 2300 of 6,855
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Oct 2017, 10:12 am by Wolfgang Demino
The crux of the matter is that a contingent fee agreement must be in writing and signed by both parties, and there was no such agreement between Hill and his former attorney. [read post]
6 Oct 2017, 11:05 am by David J. Halberg, Esq.
There is also the matter of the statute of limitations (the time in which one has to file a case). [read post]
6 Oct 2017, 2:48 am by Scott Bomboy
But there are indications in two Supreme Court decisions from the 1960s that such laws wouldn’t be evaluated favorably by the Court, which has the final say on the matter. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 5:19 pm by The Murray Law Firm
Should the facts of this matter reveal that the apartment complex owner failed to provide adequate security to protect those on its premises, the family of Bobby Lee Johnson may seek justice and elect to pursue legal claims for his wrongful death. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 7:23 am by Marty Lederman
  In this post, we try to offer some specificity and clarification with respect to these matters. [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 4:57 pm by LindaMBeale
  As an earlier post on A Taxing Matter noted, the Trump framework is a wish list for the wealthy, providing one tax cut for the ultra rich after another: elimination of the estate tax (that only affects the heirs of estates worth more than $11 million); territoriality (that advantages multinational corporations that actually operate from the U.S. but claim headquarters in low-tax jurisdictions); a flat 25% rate on "pass-through income" that gives almost a 15% rate cut to… [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 7:57 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Our summary of the issues this case presents can be found here: http://www.wagehourlitigation.com/arbitration-agreements/will-the-supreme-court-finally-remove-doubt-that-an-employer-can-mandate-that-employees-enter-into-arbitration-agreements-with-class-waivers/ Reading tea leaves from oral argument is always a challenge, especially for those who have a stake in the matter.[1] But the three authors of this post attended yesterday’s argument and, judging from the questions from… [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 7:57 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Our summary of the issues this case presents can be found here: http://www.wagehourlitigation.com/arbitration-agreements/will-the-supreme-court-finally-remove-doubt-that-an-employer-can-mandate-that-employees-enter-into-arbitration-agreements-with-class-waivers/ Reading tea leaves from oral argument is always a challenge, especially for those who have a stake in the matter.[1] But the three authors of this post attended yesterday’s argument and, judging from the questions from… [read post]
2 Oct 2017, 10:05 pm by Jeff Richardson
  Thus, no matter how you hold your iPhon [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 12:21 pm
This post examines a recent decision from a federal District Court Judge who sits in the U.S. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 5:14 am by Josh Blackman and Seth Barrett Tillman
With or without the cooperation of the president, a state government, or a foreign power for that matter, cannot change the “emoluments” of the presidency: only Congress can do that. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 5:13 am by SHG
It would appear, despite the protestations of feminist advocacy groups, and now 32 Democratic Senators, that most people, regardless of political party affiliation, still believe that due process matters. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 12:44 am by INFORRM
It is a matter I have already recommended (pdf) to the review of the Defamation Act 2009 (also here) currently being conducted by the Department of Justice. [read post]
28 Sep 2017, 9:27 am by Benton Martin, E.D. Mich.
Under Verwiebe’s theory, tripping somebody into oncoming traffic, or for that matter perpetrating a sarin gas attack, would not be a crime of violence. [read post]
28 Sep 2017, 6:11 am by MBettman
 After several continuances, the hearing for this matter was ultimately held on July 11, 2016. [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 3:06 am by Scott Bomboy
Jackson said the First Amendment barred forced allegiance to the American flag, concluding with a landmark quote: “If there is any fixed star in our constitutional constellation, it is that no official, high or petty, can prescribe what shall be orthodox in politics, nationalism, religion, or other matters of opinion, or force citizens to confess by word or act their faith therein. [read post]