Search for: "In re: Warren"
Results 2281 - 2300
of 2,861
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 May 2010, 3:39 am
Swiss Re, the world's second-biggest reinsurer, boosted its capital by around $3 billion, making the company think it can repay a costly convertible loan from billionaire Warren E. [read post]
5 May 2010, 6:03 pm
When you read the words “This is a provocative book” in a review, you know you’re in the presence of a mixed compliment. [read post]
5 May 2010, 1:22 pm
What you’re now seeing, I think, is a conservative jurisprudence that oftentimes makes the same error. [read post]
5 May 2010, 9:42 am
What you’re now seeing, I think, is a conservative jurisprudence that oftentimes makes the same error. [read post]
5 May 2010, 5:13 am
A case that every American knows because they either read it in law school, use it in cases as prosecutors and defense lawyers, or get giddy when they see it on T.V. 9 times a day on Law & Order.So for fun, I re-read Miranda.It begins with Chief Justice Warren stating that the cases before us raise questions which go to the roots of our concepts of American criminal jurisprudence: the restraints society must observe consistent with the Federal Constitution in prosecuting… [read post]
2 May 2010, 6:36 pm
By Bob Hockett So much has been said of late about Goldman Sachs -- by pundits, by members of Congress, and now by the SEC and, most recently, the DOJ -- that it might be helpful to disentangle the sundry 'issues' that seem to be implicated, though not yet adequately differentiated, by all the chatter. [read post]
1 May 2010, 3:51 am
1940 hours (EDT) Monday, 3 May 2010: DARREN’S OUT! [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 6:06 pm
Previtera said _____ got credit for a well-written letter, but still Previtera said "we're satisfied we're doing things right. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 5:04 am
And by monstrous, we’re talking potentially billions of dollars of exposure. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 6:51 am
Commentary about the nomination: Yesterday Newsweek ran a series of posts by experts on each of four potential nominees to replace Justice Stevens: Benjamin Wittes describes Merrick Garland as the “obvious choice” if President Obama wants to “promote his judicial values and re-establish himself . . . as a post-partisan president”; Rob Warden concludes that Diane Wood “has been unusually effective at building consensus with colleagues of all… [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 3:46 pm
In the last years before the American Revolution, Americans increasingly regarded not only houses but ships as castles.7 Arguing that all we’re doing is “mapping” meatspace to cyberspace is a red herring, “the purpose of which is to divert the audience from the truth or an item of significance. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 12:57 pm
It is the law we're talking about here. [read post]
25 Apr 2010, 7:22 pm
But "if you're not going to use your PIN in public, where are you going to use it? [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 7:11 am
Just do what you’re interested in, and we’ll come to you. [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 5:51 am
– from Jennifer Hays at the Warren & Hays Employment Law Blog Colwell v. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 6:18 pm
If you're keeping score, that's R 12 - D 4. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 7:32 am
Perhaps it’s because people think lawyers don’t even really have to think about the choice of entity option because they’re rich enough to hire someone to do it all for them. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 2:33 pm
” In re Cooperman, 633 N.E. 2d 1069 (N.Y. 1994). [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 12:40 pm
" Granted, he wrote that about Earl Warren, who served as Chief Justice; but before that, Warren had some important jobs. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 12:09 pm
Well, you're not alone. [read post]
