Search for: "Law v. Cross"
Results 2281 - 2300
of 15,226
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 May 2023, 12:58 am
The article reported on criminal proceedings at which Mr Seeley had given evidence for the prosecution, focusing on an allegation which had been put to Mr Seeley in cross-examination. [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 9:00 am
In Sullivan v. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 12:50 pm
PSC v. [read post]
19 Aug 2020, 4:00 am
In an action to recover damages for alleged civil rights violations pursuant to 42 USC §1983, Plaintiff appealed Supreme Court's granting the Town's cross motion for summary judgment dismissing Plaintiff's complaint. [read post]
19 Aug 2020, 4:00 am
In an action to recover damages for alleged civil rights violations pursuant to 42 USC §1983, Plaintiff appealed Supreme Court's granting the Town's cross motion for summary judgment dismissing Plaintiff's complaint. [read post]
4 Apr 2015, 10:53 am
Morgan Big Problems in California’s New Law Restricting Employers’ Access to Employees’ Online Accounts (Forbes Cross-Post) Fight Over Access to Log-in Credentials for Blog Does not Trigger Copyright Preemption – Insynq v. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 10:24 am
Weaving v. [read post]
23 Apr 2009, 9:32 am
Cross-posted from Slaw.ca [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 5:53 am
") AC34402 - State v. [read post]
20 Sep 2014, 1:06 pm
--Elements of Law 3.0: On the Relevance of a First Year Law Course Designed to Frame the Law School Curriculum). [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 8:44 am
Category: Recent Decisions;Tort Law Opinions Body: AC35463 - Bethlehem v. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 11:33 am
Category: Recent Decisions;Insurance Law Opinions;Declaratory Judgment Opinions Body: SC18681, SC18682 - Lexington Insurance Co. v. [read post]
4 May 2015, 8:36 am
Category: Recent Decisions;Contract Law Opinions Body: AC35503 - Coppola Construction Co. v. [read post]
4 Dec 2021, 6:38 am
Permitted Cannabis Promotions Subject to the federal Cannabis Regulations, authorized producers, sellers or distributors may promote cannabis if the promotion is: (i) addressed and sent to an individual who is 18 years of age or older and identified by name; (ii) in a place where young persons are not permitted by law; (iii) by means of telecommunication if reasonable steps have been taken to prevent access by a young person (e.g., an age-gated website); (iv) in a prescribed place; or… [read post]
31 May 2023, 9:55 am
Additional Resources: Fried v. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 2:57 pm
If signed by the Governor, this legislation would codify the 2008 California Supreme Court decision in Edwards v. [read post]
4 Aug 2012, 9:30 am
[cross-posted at IAPP's Daily Dashboard] Related posts: Mass Ct: ZIP Code is Personal Identification Info Under Credit Card Statute But Plaintiff Must Still Allege Harm -- Tyler v. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 10:59 am
In Western & Clay, LLC v. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 9:48 pm
Matter of Chamberlin v. [read post]
25 Aug 2009, 4:00 am
(Grafner v IDES, IllCtApp, (August 14, 2009), is an important state appellate case. [read post]