Search for: "Law v. Cross" Results 2281 - 2300 of 15,226
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 May 2023, 12:58 am by INFORRM
The article reported on criminal proceedings at which Mr Seeley had given evidence for the prosecution, focusing on an allegation which had been put to Mr Seeley in cross-examination. [read post]
19 Aug 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
In an action to recover damages for alleged civil rights violations pursuant to 42 USC §1983, Plaintiff appealed Supreme Court's granting the Town's cross motion for summary judgment dismissing Plaintiff's complaint. [read post]
19 Aug 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
In an action to recover damages for alleged civil rights violations pursuant to 42 USC §1983, Plaintiff appealed Supreme Court's granting the Town's cross motion for summary judgment dismissing Plaintiff's complaint. [read post]
4 Apr 2015, 10:53 am by Venkat Balasubramani
Morgan Big Problems in California’s New Law Restricting Employers’ Access to Employees’ Online Accounts (Forbes Cross-Post) Fight Over Access to Log-in Credentials for Blog Does not Trigger Copyright Preemption – Insynq v. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 11:33 am
Category: Recent Decisions;Insurance Law Opinions;Declaratory Judgment Opinions Body: SC18681, SC18682 - Lexington Insurance Co. v. [read post]
4 May 2015, 8:36 am
Category: Recent Decisions;Contract Law Opinions Body: AC35503 - Coppola Construction Co. v. [read post]
4 Dec 2021, 6:38 am by admin
Permitted Cannabis Promotions Subject to the federal Cannabis Regulations, authorized producers, sellers or distributors may promote cannabis if the promotion is: (i) addressed and sent to an individual who is 18 years of age or older and identified by name; (ii) in a place where young persons are not permitted by law; (iii) by means of telecommunication if reasonable steps have been taken to prevent access by a young person (e.g., an age-gated website); (iv) in a prescribed place; or… [read post]
4 Aug 2012, 9:30 am by Venkat
[cross-posted at IAPP's Daily Dashboard] Related posts: Mass Ct: ZIP Code is Personal Identification Info Under Credit Card Statute But Plaintiff Must Still Allege Harm -- Tyler v. [read post]
25 Aug 2009, 4:00 am
(Grafner v IDES, IllCtApp, (August 14, 2009), is an important state appellate case. [read post]