Search for: "Little v. Little" Results 2281 - 2300 of 39,473
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Feb 2023, 4:37 pm
 Madam Justice Horsman’s decision in Canfield v. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 10:46 am by Eric Goldman
More generally, this oral argument reminded me of the pre-Section 230 advice to businesses that they should do as little content moderation as possible so that it could argue it lacked mens rea in cases like this. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 12:36 pm
Great job.And, honestly, I feel a little bad about saying that, since it comes literally on the heels of me giving big kudos to Justice Dato for yet another opinion. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 7:07 am by Eleonora Rosati
Nestle v Cadbury [2022] EWHC 1671 (Ch) (July 2022)You can’t trade mark a colour. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
In the Matter of New York Civil Liberties Union [CLU] v New York City Department of Correction [DOC], 2023 NY Slip Op 00930, the Appellate Division noted that the personal privacy exemption in Public Officers Law §87(2)*allows state agencies to protect sensitive matters "which are of little or no public interest, and which may include unsubstantiated allegations," citing Matter of New York Times Co. v City of New York Off. of the Mayor, 194 AD3d 157. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
In the Matter of New York Civil Liberties Union [CLU] v New York City Department of Correction [DOC], 2023 NY Slip Op 00930, the Appellate Division noted that the personal privacy exemption in Public Officers Law §87(2)*allows state agencies to protect sensitive matters "which are of little or no public interest, and which may include unsubstantiated allegations," citing Matter of New York Times Co. v City of New York Off. of the Mayor, 194 AD3d 157. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 4:25 am by SHG
” And there is little question but that Section 230 was enacted in response to the Stratton Oakmont v. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 1:31 pm by Stewart Baker
What is remarkable to my mind is that a business taking so much legal risk charges so little. [read post]