Search for: "Lord v. State"
Results 2281 - 2300
of 4,051
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Aug 2012, 4:00 am
In Lord-N-Fields Voice of Freedom Bible Church Community Workers Intl., Inc. v Kwan, (Sup. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 4:52 am
Or, more recently and pertinently to this case since it involves discrimination, the case of Ghaidan v Godin-Mendoza [2004] UKHL 30 where the House of Lords ruled that the relevant provisions of the 1977 Rent Act treats the survivors of homosexual relationships less favourably than survivors of heterosexual relationships. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 5:55 pm
Sweet & Maxwell, Lord on Chapter 7, p. 272) [ix] Justice R.V. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 8:10 am
When considering whether The Suicide Act 1961 s 2 was incompatible with ECHR, art 8 it was held that the court was bound by the House of Lords’ decision in Purdy. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 8:06 am
The United Kingdom Supreme Court judgment authorising Assange’s extradition to Sweden Carl Gardner: Lord Kerr on the Assange case Carl Gardner: Supreme Court judgment: Assange v Swedish Judicial Authority Carl Gardner: Could Assange apply to set aside the Supreme Court judgment? [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 7:11 am
The Queen(on the application of Tony Nicklinson) v Ministry of Justice [2012] EWHC 2381 (Admin) – read judgment Lord Justice Toulson, sitting with Mrs Justice Royce and Mrs Justice Macur, has handed down judgment in the case of Tony Nicklinson and that of another “locked-in” syndrome sufferer, “Martin”. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 5:57 am
A brief look at caselaw in Georgia is not very illuminating--although dicta in a recent Georgia Supreme Court case relating to a nonprofit corporation (Shorter College v. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 4:17 am
The Secretary of State must act with reasonable diligence to progress deportation. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 1:33 am
In the case of Simmons v Castle [2012] EWCA Civ 1039 (a personal injury case) the Lord Chief Justice took the opportunity to announce that after 1 April 2013, general damages in tortious claims would increase by 10%. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 1:17 am
The fliers stated: "WARNING! [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 12:29 am
[25], but preferred the four factors identified by Lord Neuberger in WL Gore & Associates GmbH and Geox SPA [2008] EWHC Civ. 622 at para [25]. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 8:48 am
Citing the dicta of Lord Hoffmann in Conor v Angiotech [2008] UKHL 49 and adopting the structured approach in Pozzoli v BDMO [2007] EWCA Civ 588, Floyd held that it would not have been obvious to the skilled addressee to extend the seat into bed mode into the triangular space between the back of the seat and the cabin wall (the green section) which, in the BA First application, remained unused except for storage. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 10:12 am
Lips v Older was a case presented and argued as common law negligence only, apparently without the existence of the duty being disputed.In relation to Rimmer and Targett, the Claimant argued that issue was a positive duty of the landlord not to take steps to create a dangerous state of affairs and that this remained good law despite Murphy. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 10:12 am
Lips v Older was a case presented and argued as common law negligence only, apparently without the existence of the duty being disputed.In relation to Rimmer and Targett, the Claimant argued that issue was a positive duty of the landlord not to take steps to create a dangerous state of affairs and that this remained good law despite Murphy. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 2:21 am
High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Lord Chancellor v McCarthy [2012] EWHC 2325 (QB) (06 August 2012) High Court (Administrative Court) Reilly & Anor, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (Rev 1) [2012] EWHC 2292 (Admin) (06 August 2012) Source: www.bailii.org [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 2:00 am
In Kilby et al. v. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 2:28 pm
In fact, in complete contradiction to what I touted at the outset, Forest Park Pictures v. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 5:58 am
The trial judge held that he was bound by the Court of Appeal decisions in Ul-Haq v Shah (2009) and Widlake v BAA Limited (2009). [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 2:00 am
United States: In People v. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 1:36 am
In the courts RT (Zimbabwe) & Ors v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] UKSC 38Supreme Court: asylum seekers cannot be expected to lie or dissemble in order to achieve safety in their own country. ? [read post]
