Search for: "MATTER OF B T B"
Results 2281 - 2300
of 20,070
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jul 2011, 4:31 pm
It matters not what the creditor knew, this is essentially a strict liability rule. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 1:46 am
What mattered was the wording of the claims. [read post]
22 Oct 2007, 2:00 pm
It doesn't matter whether the defendant denies it. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 2:00 am
In this case they were running a business – a B&B – a very different matter. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 5:58 am
B.]. [read post]
6 Aug 2009, 10:37 am
Those preliminary matters are pretty important stuff. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 4:03 am
State of Florida.In the meantime, the Florida Supreme Court has another, similar, matter pending before it called Hector v. [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 7:20 am
§ 1123(b)(6). [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 9:18 am
But, I bet you wouldn’t anticipate what allegedly happened in Lazette v. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 3:56 am
The emblem is included in the USPTO database and may form the basis of a Section 2(a) or 2(b) refusal. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 2:57 pm
All that said, I don’t think we should focus too much on whether this is a matter of clarification, restatement, or expansion compared to the status quo. [read post]
5 Apr 2019, 1:18 pm
(…)’ And AM revealed: ‘My wife, who happens to work at that venerable Office, was quite surprised by the wording of the internal communiqué, which reads: “… Concerning legal matters, most of the debates were dedicated to decision T 1063/18 …, which created much legal uncertainty as it disregarded the clear interpretation provided by different authorities, namely the EPO Member States and the EU institutions. [read post]
16 Aug 2009, 10:00 pm
"Id. at *8.We don't like that result.We think Rule 9(b) says what it says, and courts should apply it.And we particularly don't like courts inventing new rules for particular kinds of litigation. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 1:25 am
Main request: Articles 100(b) and 83 EPCFor the following reasons, the requirements of Article 83 EPC are fulfilled:[...]3. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 9:13 pm
(triang. setoff) among multiple affiliates outside of BK not enforceable in BK. http://www.bankruptcylitigationblog.com/uploads/file/LehmanBrosInc-BK-SDNY-10-4-11-Peck.pdf … B-NY: Stern inapplic. despite fact that dfdt's concession that matter was core occurred well before Stern was decided. http://www.bankruptcylitigationblog.com/uploads/file/Citron-BK-EDNY-Rosenthal-10-6-11.pdf … B-CA analyzes what Stern held & didnt hold, concluding… [read post]
8 May 2023, 11:43 pm
As detailed below, the Enlarged Board's basic reasoning used in arriving at its final conclusion is quite general and unrelated to any general emergency considerations.1.6 In a recent case, the view has been expressed with regard to Article 15a RPBA 2020 that the exercise of discretion in deciding on the format of the oral proceedings was to be based on the criterion of the "appropriateness" of the format only - as set out in that provision -, and that no further criteria are binding… [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 9:28 am
If consumers can’t tell difference b/t product and brand, would we be better served by a more careful definition of what sort of confusion ought to be actionable? [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 11:29 am
(But don’t hold me accountable if they don’t). [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 11:52 am
(H/T: Christopher Lund, from a debate on the Law and Religion listserv). [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 12:00 pm
But anyway, the court didn’t need to make a definitive ruling, because Rule 9(b) was satisfied even if it did apply. [read post]
