Search for: "MATTER OF C B J B"
Results 2281 - 2300
of 3,062
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Nov 2013, 9:09 pm
B. [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 3:13 pm
(Id. at 799-823, dis. opn. of Arabian, J.) [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 3:13 pm
(Id. at 799-823, dis. opn. of Arabian, J.) [read post]
28 Feb 2022, 9:01 pm
Such crimes have two features in common: (a) they involve perpetrators who know their victims well, and (b) they involve physical and emotional abuse of their victims. [read post]
15 Mar 2024, 1:45 pm
Steven C. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 10:07 am
§ 1229a(c)(7)(A), to have her single, timely motion to reopen the proceeding considered on its merits, notwithstanding 8 C.F.R. [read post]
11 May 2010, 2:40 am
Speakers will include: • R Jovita Baber, University of Illinois, “Multiplicity of Meanings: Legal Pluralism and the Layer Legality of Land in Sixteenth-century Andes” • Louis Berkvens, Maastricht University, “An Approach of comparative history of legislation” • Juan B. [read post]
13 Dec 2007, 10:16 am
Vincent's Catholic Medical Center of New York separately appeals, from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Bayne, J.), dated May 17, 2006, which, (a) upon a jury verdict on the issue of liability, (b) upon a jury verdict on the issue of damages awarding the infant plaintiff the sums of $50,000 for future medical care, $40,000 for future medical equipment, $40,000 for future physical therapy, $40,000 for future occupational therapy, $40,000 for future psychological… [read post]
22 Apr 2012, 5:32 am
-Vince B. [read post]
21 Aug 2011, 9:32 pm
Could such a change to the US grey goods market only be a matter of time? [read post]
11 Aug 2021, 10:57 am
(B) The law might be unconstitutional. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 12:24 pm
The author of this blog is Douglas C. [read post]
26 Feb 2017, 6:37 pm
The court stated In re David J. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 9:49 am
Richard C. [read post]
31 Oct 2007, 6:03 am
J. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 7:12 am
END Erik J. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 6:17 am
As Mark J. [read post]
8 May 2020, 5:58 am
Freed and Karl J. [read post]
11 Feb 2019, 9:19 am
Assuming this matter goes forward, which one might think that it will unless it becomes academic, there are interesting arguments which may open up about amenability of HAs to JR (see (131)) and whether Agudas Israel was providing a system of allocation of social housing, without any relevant entitlements, or a service of providing housing accommodation – here the Divisional Court, at (50), offered a different opinion to that of Garnham J in R(XC) v Southwark… [read post]
