Search for: "MATTER OF K A B"
Results 2281 - 2300
of 2,720
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jun 2010, 3:01 pm
A detergent composition comprising (a) 15 to 40% by weight of an anionic surfactant, (b) 0.5 to 5% by weight of a chlorine scavenger, (c) a protease whose ? [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 6:47 am
§ 203(k). [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 3:01 pm
In this case the patent was opposed on the grounds based on A 100(a), (b) and (c). [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 10:49 am
Wal-Mart and the other defendants moved for dismissal under Rules 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure—lack of subject matter jurisdiction and failure to state a claim respectively. [read post]
13 Jun 2010, 3:01 pm
The subject-matter of the claimed invention remained the same, which meant that the two claims were substantively equivalent.[6.2.3] In the case underlying decision T 292/04 [5-6], claim 1 concerned the use of a substance in the manufacture of an antimicrobial agent and was drafted in the Swiss-claim format. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 8:36 am
” See 2 K. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 6:32 am
See Insurance Law § 3105 (b). [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 2:20 am
As the Panel in Sound Unseen, Ltd.; Apple Bottoms, LLC; and Cornell Haynes p/k/a “Nelly” v. [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 3:02 pm
While clearly implicit in those legislative requirements, the caselaw adds that the grounds of appeal must be analysed vis-à-vis the reasons in the decision under appeal and must enable the board and the respondent to understand immediately why the decision is alleged to be incorrect: what the Board in its communication called the need for “argument or reasoning linking the matters set out in the statement of grounds with the reasons given by the OD in its decision”. [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 7:35 am
- Company details (legal name, d/b/a, f/k/a, address, corporate form, state of incorporation, affiliates/subsidiaries/parents)- Insurance information (if applicable)- Key personnel name and contact information (general counsel, relevant outside counsel, appropriate business decision-maker/person with settlement or budgetary authority, risk manager, involved employees, etc.)- Other involved parties (potential defendants, plaintiffs, third-parties, witnesses, etc.)- What… [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 11:05 pm
B-K Lighting v. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 3:02 pm
Apparently the applicant is not familiar with patent matters and insufficiently informed on how time limits operate. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 10:31 am
§§ 841(a)(1), 841(b)(1)(A, C, D), 846. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 6:10 am
§§ 78j(b), 78t(a), and Rule 10b-5, 17 C.F.R. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 5:03 pm
Rockwell testified that if he had been responsible for complying with the 15-minute rule, he would have "k[ept] an eye" on Manriquez for an additional 15-minute period after his arrival at the jail. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 8:45 am
Prior to the CPR the test under the rules was that any document “relating to any matter in question” was discoverable. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 8:45 am
Prior to the CPR the test under the rules was that any document “relating to any matter in question” was discoverable. [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 5:00 am
Stuart K. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 3:02 pm
According to the opponents, that case was similar to the present one. [11.9] The case law also mentions decision T 168/99 [1], in which it was decided that withdrawal of subject-matter (there, of the granted claims before the OD had commented on them) did not necessarily mean that it had formally been abandoned. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 3:06 am
Project management is nothing more than rationally supervising the process of (a) deploying resources (b) which have associated costs (c) against tasks (d) to accomplish specified objectives. [read post]
