Search for: "MATTER OF RULES OF EVIDENCE"
Results 2281 - 2300
of 42,196
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Aug 2011, 8:53 am
I was just clearing my throat.But PA attorney Max Kennerly in a fine article here thinks obstructing the deposition any way you can in order to save your client from telling the truth may not be permissible after all: Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 30(c)(1) is quite clear: “The examination and cross-examination of a deponent proceed as they would at trial under the Federal Rules of Evidence …” If an attorney has an objection to a question, then… [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 7:40 pm
It is based on documents, stipulations of the parties, agreed upon or contested issues and other matters unique to the individual case. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 3:27 pm
As I noted above, on each issue raised in the plaintiff's motion for judgment as a matter of law, Judge Davis found that there was evidence to support the jury's decision. ? [read post]
25 Jun 2024, 3:07 pm
We can assume that, strictly as a matter of modern rules of evidence, Longoni’s testimony would be admissible, under FRE 703 or its state counterparts, or at least would be given a proper foundation. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 6:42 am
After the close of evidence in the jury trial, the court granted judgment as a matter of law on the employee’s NYSHRL failure-to-accommodate claim. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 5:21 pm
Ruling in Trump v. [read post]
16 Jun 2019, 8:55 pm
Why It Matters The reason residency status matters for tax purposes is also often misconstrued. [read post]
15 Apr 2007, 12:04 am
There's almost never evidence of a manufacturing defect. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 7:00 am
Like other interlocutory rulings they may be reviewed as a matter of right upon appeal from the final judgment. [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 2:34 am
Patents in OAPI Member States can only be issued by OAPI and so, OAPI Member States share harmonised rules on patentable subject matter and only exclude the subject matters specifically permissible under the TRIPS Agreement. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 6:00 am
The Appellate Division unanimously affirmed the lower court's ruling, without costs. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 6:00 am
The Appellate Division unanimously affirmed the lower court's ruling, without costs. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 5:13 am
On 27 June 2013 South Africa’s constitutional court has ruled on two matters of interest for specialists of private international law, specifically international civil procedure. [read post]
7 Jun 2017, 6:04 am
We agree with the district court that in these circumstances, Diggs’s showing falls short of the “strong evidence” required to determine that the arbitrator’s decision was wrong as a matter of fact. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 4:44 pm
You can agree or disagree with this rule as a policy matter, but I get from whence it's coming.The harder part for me is deciding when the exception applies on a particular set of facts. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 11:57 am
No matter how confident you may be in your innocence, or how insignificant you may consider your evidence, the proceedings are intimidating. [read post]
15 Dec 2013, 6:31 am
My question is how much should that language matter, both in class discussion and on the exam? [read post]
22 May 2018, 5:00 am
The court ruled that a verdict is not against the weight of the evidence simply because the evidence at trial was conflicting or that a reasonable fact-finder could have decided the case in favor of either party. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 1:19 pm
Also retained but now at rule 12.19 is the general restriction on filing evidence other than that specifically permitted by direction of the court. [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 9:24 am
(Yay for the court showing the evidence!). [read post]
